Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Tools for the Real-Time Assessment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Model
Published on: April 6, 2021
Multiomics informed mathematical model for meropenem and tobramycin against hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J R Tait1, A A Agyeman2, C López-Causapé3
1Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Background:
Hypermutable P. aeruginosa isolates frequently display resistance emergence during treatment. Mechanisms of such resistance emergence have not been explored using dynamic hollow-fiber studies and multiomics informed mathematical modeling.
Methods:
Two hypermutable and heteroresistant P. aeruginosa isolates, CW8 (MICmeropenem=8 mg/L, MICtobramycin=8 mg/L) and CW44 (MICmeropenem=4 mg/L, MICtobramycin=2 mg/L), were studied. Both isolates had genotypes resembling those of carbapenem- and aminoglycoside-resistant strains. Achievable lung fluid concentration-time profiles following meropenem at 1 or 2 g every 8 h (3-h infusion) and tobramycin at 5 or 10 mg/kg body weight every 24 h (0.5-h infusion), in monotherapy and combinations, were simulated over 8 days. Total and resistant bacterial counts were determined. Resistant colonies and whole population samples at 191 h were whole-genome sequenced, and population transcriptomics performed at 1 and 191 h. The multiomics analyses informed mechanism-based modeling of total and resistant populations.
Results:
While both isolates eventually displayed resistance emergence against all regimens, the high-dose combination synergistically suppressed resistant regrowth of only CW8 up to ∼96 h. Mutations that emerged during treatment were in pmrB, ampR, and multiple efflux pump regulators for CW8, and in pmrB and PBP2 for CW44. At 1 h, mexB, oprM and ftsZ were differentially downregulated in CW8 by the combination. These transcriptomics results informed inclusion of mechanistic synergy in the mechanism-based model for only CW8. At 191 h, norspermidine genes were upregulated (without a pmrB mutation) in CW8 by the combination, and informed the adaptive loss of synergy in the model.
Conclusion:
Multiomics information enabled mechanism-based modeling to describe the bacterial response of both isolates simultaneously.
Importance:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes serious bacterial infections in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), and has numerous resistance mechanisms. Current empirical approaches to informing antibiotic regimen selection have important limitations. This study exposed two P. aeruginosa clinical isolates to concentration-time profiles of meropenem and tobramycin as would be observed in lung fluid of pwCF. The combination elicited different bacterial count profiles between the isolates, despite similar bacterial baseline characteristics. We found differences between the isolates in the expression of a key resistance mechanism against meropenem at 1 h, and expression that implied a loss of cell membrane permeability for tobramycin without the expected DNA mutation. This information enabled mathematical modeling to accurately describe all bacterial profiles over time. For the first time, this multiomics informed modeling approach using DNA and RNA data was applied to a hollow-fiber infection study. Using bacterial molecular insights with mechanism-based mathematical modeling has high potential for ultimately informing personalised antibiotic therapy.
Insights
This study used hollow-fiber models and multiomics to understand how Pseudomonas aeruginosa develops antibiotic resistance. Mathematical modeling revealed distinct resistance mechanisms in two isolates, paving the way for personalized antibiotic therapies.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Pharmacology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates often develop antibiotic resistance during treatment.
- Understanding resistance mechanisms is crucial for effective treatment, especially in cystic fibrosis patients.
- Current methods for selecting antibiotic regimens have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate resistance emergence in hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa using dynamic hollow-fiber studies and multiomics-informed mathematical modeling.
- To simulate antibiotic concentration-time profiles in lung fluid and observe bacterial responses.
- To compare the resistance mechanisms of two distinct P. aeruginosa isolates under meropenem and tobramycin treatment.
Main Methods:
- Two hypermutable, heteroresistant P. aeruginosa isolates (CW8 and CW44) were exposed to simulated lung fluid concentration-time profiles of meropenem and tobramycin.
- Whole-genome sequencing and population transcriptomics were performed on bacterial samples.
- Multiomics data informed mechanism-based mathematical modeling of bacterial populations.
Main Results:
- Both isolates developed resistance, but a high-dose combination therapy synergistically suppressed resistant regrowth in CW8 for up to 96 hours.
- Emergent mutations differed between isolates, affecting genes like pmrB, ampR, and PBP2.
- Transcriptomic analysis revealed differential gene expression, including downregulation of mexB, oprM, and ftsZ in CW8, and upregulation of norspermidine genes, indicating adaptive resistance mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- Multiomics data successfully informed mechanism-based modeling to simultaneously describe the bacterial responses of both P. aeruginosa isolates.
- This integrated approach provides a powerful tool for understanding complex antibiotic resistance dynamics.
- The findings highlight the potential for multiomics-informed mathematical modeling to guide personalized antibiotic therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

