Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Elastic scattering spectroscopy for intraoperative oral cancer mucosal margin guidance: Initial results from a 104
G P Krisciunas1, E Rodriguez-Diaz2, L Berry1
1Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, 800 Harrison Avenue, Boston 02119, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical Center, 800 Harrison Avenue, Boston 02119, MA, USA.
Objective:
To assess Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy (ESS) classification accuracy of benign vs malignant tissue obtained during intra-operative oral cancer resection.
Methods:
The study comprised 104 patients with a biopsy positive for oral cancer (N = 85) or dysplasia (N = 19) who were scheduled to undergo surgical excision. ESS measurements were obtained intraoperatively on and immediately adjacent to the lesion within the planned resection margin prior to excision, and on contralateral normal-site control tissue. Two-millimeter biopsies were obtained from tumor and margin tissue. All measurements were evaluated using Leave One Person Out (LOPO) AI-assisted statistical algorithms. Three analyses evaluated ESS diagnostic accuracy: one at the sample level, one at the pooled sample patient level, and one using only diagnostically variable biopsy co-registered margin samples. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).
Results:
Diagnostic accuracy at the sample level yielded sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 84 %, and AUC = 0.91. Pooling samples within each patient yielded sensitivity = 94 %, specificity = 87 %, and AUC = 0.95. Sample level diagnostic accuracy at the margin yielded sensitivity = 76 %, specificity = 50 %, and AUC = 0.70, but prioritizing sensitivity, yielded a sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 30 %, with AUC = 0.70.
Conclusion:
The ESS device demonstrated high sensitivity and appropriate specificity when differentiating benign from malignant tissue. Discriminant ability increased when samples were pooled within patients, informing future protocols for evaluating intraoperative ESS measures. These data are very promising and support the contention that ESS could be a valuable adjunct tool that facilitates comprehensive and efficient assessment of surgical margins.

