Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Thrombotic response to mechanical circulatory support devices
Tiffany Goh1, Lining Arnold Ju2, Anna Waterhouse3
1School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW 2008, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The University of Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use triggers thrombosis and hemostatic disorders, which may become fatal if thrombi occlude circulation or cause embolic complications. Consequently, antithrombotic medications are administered, which often cannot eliminate thrombosis and further compromise patient survival by introducing an additional risk of severe bleeding events. MCS thrombosis is induced and affected by the combined interplay of patient pathology, the foreign artificial biomaterial's surface properties, and pathological flow conditions. From a device design perspective, the latter 2 may be controlled for and redesigned to minimize the thrombotic response. This review examines how MCS thrombosis is affected by the biomaterial properties of surface roughness and topography, chemistry and charge, wettability, and bioactive coatings and the hemodynamic flow properties of margination, low flow and coagulation, high flow and platelet activation, von Willebrand factor activation, and hemolysis. For each property, we explain its well-established underlying biological, chemical, or physical effects on thrombosis and highlight current and proposed design strategies that could reduce MCS thrombosis. We review the potential reasons thrombosis still complicates MCS devices and postulate that an improved understanding of the dominant thrombotic process occurring at specific regions of devices and mechanistic insights into the combined effects of material properties with flow are still required. Together, we provide a guide for potential biomaterial and flow design changes to reduce thrombosis in MCS, emphasizing that novel biomaterials and device geometries should be tested under operationally and clinically relevant flow conditions to develop safer future-generation devices with reduced thrombotic responses.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Vascular Spasm
Introduction to Hemostasis
The three phases of hemostasis involve many clotting factors present in plasma and several substances released by platelets and injured tissue cells. It is a fast, localized,...
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Pathways of Hemostasis
The Extrinsic Pathway
The extrinsic pathway of coagulation is typically initiated by tissue damage that exposes blood to tissue factor (TF), a protein released by the damaged tissue cells outside the blood vessels—this interaction with TF triggers biochemical reactions involving specific clotting factors. The key player here is Factor VII, which...