Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...
Mass Analyzers: Overview01:13

Mass Analyzers: Overview

The mass analyzer is a crucial component of the mass spectrometer. In the ionization chamber, the vaporized sample is bombarded with a high-energy electron beam to generate a radical cation and further fragment into neutral molecules, radicals, and cations. A series of negatively charged accelerator plates accelerate the cations into the mass analyzer. The mass analyzer separates ions according to their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios and then directs them to the detector. The common types of mass...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SELAM: selective ECC-based lightweight authentication for the internet of medical things.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Tumor-specific PET tracer imaging and contrast-enhanced Mri based tumor volume differences inspection of glioblastoma patients.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Utilizing CBNet to effectively address and combat cyberbullying among university students on social media platforms.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Enhancing IoT security with a DNA-based lightweight cryptography system.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Retraction Note: DNA encoding schemes herald a new age in cybersecurity for safeguarding digital assets.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

DNA encoding schemes herald a new age in cybersecurity for safeguarding digital assets.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Key insights into recommended SMS spam detection datasets.

Mohammad Firdaus Johari1, Kang Leng Chiew2, Abdul Razak Hosen1

  • 1Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, 94300, Malaysia.

Scientific Reports
|March 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates SMS spam detection datasets using machine learning models. Dataset 5 is recommended for future research due to its complexity and qualitative features, promoting robust spam detection.

Keywords:
Dataset evaluationDataset recommendationMachine learningSMS spam detectionStopwords removal

More Related Videos

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

597
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

616

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K
DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

597
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

616

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Information Security

Background:

  • Short Message Service (SMS) spam presents significant security risks, including financial fraud and phishing.
  • Existing SMS spam detection models often rely on various datasets, but their effectiveness and impact are under-evaluated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of ten SMS spam detection datasets.
  • To evaluate datasets based on accuracy and qualitative factors for improved SMS spam detection models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Decision Tree and Multinomial Naïve Bayes models to evaluate ten SMS spam detection datasets.
  • Assessed datasets on accuracy, authenticity, class imbalance, feature diversity, metadata, and preprocessing needs.
  • Conducted experiments with English and non-English stopword removal groups due to dataset multilingualism.

Main Results:

  • Dataset 5 achieved a high qualitative score (3.8/5.0) due to feature diversity, real-world complexity, and balanced classes.
  • Multinomial Naïve Bayes showed a detection rate of 86.10% on Dataset 5, indicating a challenging yet informative dataset.
  • Qualitative assessment proved crucial in dataset evaluation beyond mere accuracy metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Dataset 5 is recommended for future SMS spam detection research to foster more robust and adaptable models.
  • Selecting datasets with high qualitative scores enhances research quality, model generalizability, and mitigates bias.
  • Challenging datasets encourage the development of spam detection systems capable of handling diverse noise and ambiguity.