Childhood disabilities, household poverty, and inequality: A population-based case-control study in rural Bangladesh

Israt Jahan1,2,3, Tasneem Karim1,2,4,5, Risad Sultana1

  • 1CSF Global, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Insights

Children with disabilities in rural Bangladesh face higher poverty likelihood and inequality. Interventions are crucial to reduce these disparities and align with Sustainable Development Goals.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Disability Studies
  • Socioeconomic Determinants of Health

Background:

  • Poverty and inequality are significant challenges in low-resource settings.
  • Understanding the intersection of disability, poverty, and inequality is crucial for targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between household poverty, inequality, and childhood disability in rural Bangladesh.
  • To identify disparities faced by children with disabilities in low-resource environments.

Main Methods:

  • A matched case-control study was conducted in Shahjadpur, Bangladesh.
  • 1274 children with disabilities and 1303 controls were recruited and assessed.
  • Household poverty likelihood and socioeconomic status (SES) were evaluated using a poverty scorecard.

Main Results:

  • Children with disabilities exhibited a 7% higher household poverty likelihood compared to controls (p < 0.001).
  • Lower parental employment, family income, and school enrollment were observed in cases, particularly in low SES families.
  • Underweight and stunting rates were significantly higher in children with disabilities (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Findings underscore the heightened vulnerability of children with disabilities to poverty and inequality in rural Bangladesh.
  • The results emphasize the need for targeted interventions to reduce disparities and promote inclusion, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
178
Conduct Disorder01:28

Conduct Disorder

Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
23
Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
34
Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
20.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K