Childhood disabilities, household poverty, and inequality: A population-based case-control study in rural Bangladesh
Israt Jahan1,2,3, Tasneem Karim1,2,4,5, Risad Sultana1
1CSF Global, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Insights
Children with disabilities in rural Bangladesh face higher poverty likelihood and inequality. Interventions are crucial to reduce these disparities and align with Sustainable Development Goals.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Disability Studies
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health
Background:
- Poverty and inequality are significant challenges in low-resource settings.
- Understanding the intersection of disability, poverty, and inequality is crucial for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between household poverty, inequality, and childhood disability in rural Bangladesh.
- To identify disparities faced by children with disabilities in low-resource environments.
Main Methods:
- A matched case-control study was conducted in Shahjadpur, Bangladesh.
- 1274 children with disabilities and 1303 controls were recruited and assessed.
- Household poverty likelihood and socioeconomic status (SES) were evaluated using a poverty scorecard.
Main Results:
- Children with disabilities exhibited a 7% higher household poverty likelihood compared to controls (p < 0.001).
- Lower parental employment, family income, and school enrollment were observed in cases, particularly in low SES families.
- Underweight and stunting rates were significantly higher in children with disabilities (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Findings underscore the heightened vulnerability of children with disabilities to poverty and inequality in rural Bangladesh.
- The results emphasize the need for targeted interventions to reduce disparities and promote inclusion, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals.
Aim:
To explore the relationship between household poverty, inequality, and disability among children in rural Bangladesh.
Method:
This was a matched case-control study in Shahjadpur, northern Sirajganj, Bangladesh. Children aged younger than 18 years with disabilities (i.e.
Cases:
those with cerebral palsy, spina bifida, hydrocephalus, muscular dystrophy, spinal cord injury, amputation, club foot, cleft lip or palate, trauma or burn-related injury or impairment, congenital deformity, genetic condition, and visual, hearing, and speech impairments) and age-, sex-, and location-matched children without disabilities (i.e. controls) were recruited. Cases were identified using the key informant method. Household poverty likelihood and socioeconomic status (SES) were assessed using a validated poverty scorecard. Descriptive and inferential analyses were completed.
Results:
Between October 2017 and February 2018, 1274 cases and 1303 controls were recruited (median age at assessment 9 years 10 months [interquartile range 6 years 0 months-13 years 7 months] and 9 years 10 months [5 years 8 months-12 years 0 months] respectively). The household poverty likelihood was 7% higher among cases than controls (p < 0.001). Parental employment, family income, and school enrolment rate were significantly lower among cases than controls especially in the families with low SES. Both underweight and stunting were significantly higher among cases than controls (p < 0.001 for both). Receipt of rehabilitation services and health-care seeking from formal sectors were significantly lower among cases from families with low SES than high SES (60% vs. 71%, p = 0.03; 10% vs. 33%, p < 0.001 respectively).
Interpretation:
Our findings are crucial to develop interventions and reduce the inequalities between children with and without disabilities in low-resource settings such as Bangladesh as highlighted in the global agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals.
More Related Videos
10:57Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Case Studies
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Conduct Disorder
Intellectual Disability
Nature and Nurture
Group Design
