Medicaid's Cranio-Cap: Medicaid Reimbursement for Craniosynostosis Repair is Not Trending With the Rate of Inflation

Jasmine M Chaij1,2, Jacob B Hammond2, Skyler K Palmer1,2

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado.

Insights

Medicaid reimbursement for craniosynostosis surgery has declined significantly after adjusting for inflation. This negative growth may delay essential craniofacial care for children and impact specialized treatment teams.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric surgery
  • Health economics
  • Craniofacial anomalies

Background:

  • Craniosynostosis necessitates timely intervention to prevent impaired cranial development.
  • Medicaid reimbursement rates have not kept pace with medical inflation, leading to potential treatment delays.
  • This study examines the impact of economic inflation on Medicaid reimbursement for craniosynostosis care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Medicaid reimbursement trends for craniosynostosis procedures from 2013 to 2023.
  • To analyze the longitudinal impact of economic inflation on these reimbursements.
  • To assess the financial sustainability of specialized craniofacial care teams.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for craniosynostosis operations.
  • Medicaid reimbursement data from 2013-2023, adjusted for inflation to 2023 US dollars.
  • Comparison of inflation-adjusted reimbursement growth and Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) with the US Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Main Results:

  • Average inflation-adjusted reimbursement for craniosynostosis surgery decreased by -21.31% between 2013 and 2023.
  • All analyzed procedures showed a negative CAGR, averaging -2.41%.
  • Inflation-adjusted reimbursements demonstrated significant negative growth across all CPT codes.

Conclusions:

  • Inflation-adjusted reimbursement for common craniosynostosis operations has experienced negative growth.
  • This financial trend may exacerbate delays in accessing craniofacial care.
  • The findings raise concerns about the financial viability of multidisciplinary craniofacial treatment centers.
Abstract