Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in heavily calcified aortic valve stenosis: a multicenter comparison
M Saad1, H Seoudy2,3, K Bramlage4
1Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str.3, Haus K3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. mohammed.saad@uksh.de.
Insights
In patients with severe aortic stenosis and heavy calcifications, the CoreValve Evolut PRO and SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra transcatheter heart valves demonstrated lower paravalvular leak rates than the CoreValve Evolut R. The CoreValve platform also offered superior hemodynamics.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) with heavy calcifications presents challenges for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- Limited data exists on transcatheter heart valve (THV) performance in this specific patient subgroup.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve Evolut (Evolut R and Evolut PRO) and balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV.
- To evaluate THV performance in patients with heavily calcified severe AS undergoing TAVR.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter registry of 1513 patients with heavily calcified AS undergoing TAVR.
- Primary endpoint: incidence and degree of paravalvular leak (PVL).
- Secondary endpoints: post-implant hemodynamics and clinical outcomes (VARC-3 definitions).
Main Results:
- CoreValve Evolut R showed higher mild PVL rates than SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra (44.8% vs. 29.5%). No significant difference in ≥ moderate PVL.
- CoreValve Evolut R and PRO demonstrated superior post-implant hemodynamics compared to SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra.
- No significant differences in permanent pacemaker implantation or all-cause mortality among the groups.
Conclusions:
- CoreValve Evolut PRO and SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV exhibited lower PVL rates than CoreValve Evolut R in heavily calcified AS.
- The self-expanding CoreValve platform provided superior post-implant hemodynamics compared to SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra.
Background:
Heavy calcifications in severe aortic stenosis (AS) pose a major challenge in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Only a few studies have addressed the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THV) in this subgroup of patients.
Objectives:
We aimed to investigate the outcomes of the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve Evolut valve frame and the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV in this challenging patient population.
Materials And Methods:
This was a multicenter registry including a total of 1513 patients with heavily calcified AS undergoing TAVR. The primary endpoint was the incidence and degree of paravalvular leak (PVL) after TAVR. Secondary endpoints were post-implant hemodynamics as well as clinical endpoints according to the VARC-3 definitions.
Results:
The CoreValve Evolut R but not the Evolut PRO showed significantly higher rates of PVL compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra (44.8% vs. 29.5% for mild PVL, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in ≥ moderate PVL between both groups (p = 0.399). The CoreValve Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed superior THV hemodynamics compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra group. These findings were confirmed in a propensity score-matched analysis. There were no significant differences regarding short-term outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation and all-cause mortality between the three groups.
Conclusion:
In patients with severely calcified AS, both CoreValve Evolut PRO and SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV showed lower rates of PVL than the CoreValve Evolut R. The self-expanding CoreValve platform had superior post-implant hemodynamics than the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra system.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
04:30Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management