Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials.

N J Birkett

    Controlled Clinical Trials
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Minimization, an adaptive allocation method, provides unbiased treatment effect estimates and boosts statistical power in randomized controlled trials compared to simple randomization. It shows comparable or superior power to stratification, especially with complex variable sets.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Blood pressure measurement by family physicians.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
    Same author

    Predicting exercise stage transitions over two consecutive 6-month periods: a test of the theory of planned behaviour in a population-based sample.

    British journal of health psychology·2003
    Same author

    Exercise and the transtheoretical model: a longitudinal test of a population sample.

    Preventive medicine·2001
    Same author

    Intake of fruits and vegetables in smokers.

    Public health nutrition·1999
    Same author

    Comments on a meta-analysis of the relation between dietary calcium intake and blood pressure.

    American journal of epidemiology·1998
    Same author

    Trends in smoking by birth cohort for births between 1940 and 1975: a reconstructed cohort analysis of the 1990 Ontario Health Survey.

    Preventive medicine·1997
    Same journal

    On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Trials Methodology

    Background:

    • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) risk chance imbalance in prognostic factors with large numbers of variables.
    • Adaptive allocation procedures aim to mitigate this imbalance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare minimization, a type of adaptive allocation, against simple randomization and stratified allocation in RCTs.
    • To evaluate the impact on treatment effect estimation, rejection region size, and statistical power.

    Main Methods:

    • Monte Carlo simulations were employed to assess the performance of different allocation methods.
    • Key outcomes analyzed included estimated treatment effect, rejection region size, and statistical power.

    Main Results:

    • Minimization yielded unbiased treatment effect estimates and increased statistical power versus simple randomization.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Student's t test was found to be conservative for both minimization and stratified allocation.
  • Minimization and stratification offered similar power improvements, with minimization showing potential advantages when not all variables could be stratified.

    • Conclusions:

    • Minimization is an effective adaptive allocation strategy for RCTs, enhancing power and ensuring unbiased treatment effect estimates.
    • It offers a viable alternative to stratification, particularly in complex trial designs.