Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

4.8K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Degradable Tumor-Responsive Iron-Doped Phosphate-Based Glass Nanozyme for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Self-Supplying Cancer Therapy.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2022
Same author

Polarization of tumor-associated macrophages by TLR7/8 conjugated radiosensitive peptide hydrogel for overcoming tumor radioresistance.

Bioactive materials·2022
Same author

In-biofilm generation of nitric oxide using a magnetically-targetable cascade-reaction container for eradication of infectious biofilms.

Bioactive materials·2022
Same author

Trace amine-associated receptor 1 and drug abuse.

Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.)·2022
Same author

Surface quality of laser paint removal of marine steel: a comparative study using a Gaussian beam and a flat-top beam.

Applied optics·2022
Same author

Chemical Compounds Emitted from <i>Mentha spicata</i> Repel <i>Aromia bungii</i> Females.

Insects·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.7K

Genomic selection in pig breeding: comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.

Ruilin Su1, Jingbo Lv1, Yahui Xue2

  • 1College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE
|March 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study compared machine learning methods for pig genomic prediction. Stacking, Support Vector Regression, and Kernel Ridge Regression showed high accuracy and stability, making them recommended for predicting pig phenotypes.

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Animal Breeding and Genetics
  • Genomics
  • Machine Learning Applications

Background:

  • Genomic prediction (GP) is crucial for pig breeding progress, utilizing SNP markers to predict phenotypic values.
  • Machine learning (ML) methods are effective for high-dimensional data in GP, but optimal methods for pigs are not well-established.
  • Selecting appropriate ML methods is essential for effective pig genomic prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of popular ML methods for pig genomic prediction.
  • To identify suitable ML methods for predicting various pig traits.
  • To provide recommendations for ML approaches in pig breeding.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized five common datasets from existing literature for method comparison.
  • Evaluated popular ML algorithms including Stacking, Kernel Ridge Regression with RBF kernel (KRR-rbf), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP).
  • Assessed prediction accuracy across different datasets and trait types (hidden, reproductive, growth).

Main Results:

  • Stacking demonstrated superior performance on the PIC dataset with hidden trait information, closely followed by KRR-rbf.
  • SVR excelled in predicting reproductive traits, with GBLUP as the second-best performer.
  • GBLUP achieved the highest accuracy for growth traits, with SVR performing second best.

Conclusions:

  • GBLUP, Stacking, SVR, and KRR-RBF are effective methods for genomic prediction in pigs.
  • LR statistical analysis confirmed the stability of Stacking, SVR, and KRR methods.
  • Recommends Stacking, SVR, and KRR as reliable ML approaches for phenotypic value prediction in pigs.