Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
Published on: May 31, 2018
Dissociating Affective Salience and Valence in (Very) Long-Latency ERPs
Hans Revers1, Jeroen J Stekelenburg1, Jean Vroomen1
1Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
This study found that both positive and negative images elicit larger brain responses than neutral images, confirming affective salience. A later effect showed negative images produced stronger responses than positive ones, indicating a long-latency valence effect.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Affective Science
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Affective salience effects are consistently observed in the late positive potential (LPP) but ordered valence effects in event-related potentials (ERPs) remain inconsistent.
- Previous research suggested valence-related effects at very long latencies (1000-3000 ms) using facial attractiveness stimuli, prompting further investigation into general valence effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the existence of a long-latency valence effect in electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to general image stimuli.
- To determine if affective processing involves distinct stages of salience detection followed by valence differentiation.
Main Methods:
- Presented 224 participants with positive, neutral, and negative International Affective Picture System (IAPS) images.
- Recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure event-related potentials (ERPs).
- Analyzed ERP amplitudes across different time windows to identify affective salience and valence effects.
Main Results:
- An affective salience effect (larger ERPs for positive/negative vs. neutral stimuli) was observed from approximately 500 to 1300 ms.
- A long-latency valence effect (larger ERPs for negative vs. positive stimuli) emerged between 1500 and 2500 ms.
- The polarity of the long-latency valence effect contrasted with findings from a facial attractiveness study.
Conclusions:
- Findings support a two-stage model of emotion processing, with initial affective salience detection followed by later valence differentiation.
- The results align with theories of constructed emotion, suggesting a dynamic interplay of neural processes in affective perception.
- Allostasis is proposed as a potential mechanism to reconcile differing valence effect polarities across studies.
More Related Videos
05:36Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Depression
Reason and Intuition
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over time, all...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Desirable Characteristics in Others
Ending Relationships