Microbiota and metabolite-based prediction tool for colonic polyposis with and without a known genetic driver

  • 0Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Microbiome and metabolome analysis reveals distinct microbial and metabolite profiles in colonic polyposis, differentiating genetic-positive and serrated polyposis syndrome patients from others, aiding diagnostic tools.

Area Of Science

  • Gastroenterology and Microbiome Research
  • Molecular Diagnostics and Biomarkers

Background

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyp research extensively studies microbiome and metabolome, yet profiles in colonic polyposis, especially with genetic drivers, are underexplored.
  • Understanding these profiles is crucial for developing targeted diagnostic and preventative strategies for polyposis patients and families.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To investigate and compare the microbiome and metabolome profiles in individuals with colonic polyposis, including gene-positive (Gene-pos) and gene-negative (Gene-neg) adenomatous polyposis, and serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS).
  • To identify microbial and metabolic signatures that can differentiate between these polyposis subtypes and potentially serve as diagnostic or risk-stratification tools.

Main Methods

  • 16S rRNA sequencing was used on colon biopsies, polyps, and stool samples to analyze mucosa-associated microbiota.
  • Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was employed to differentiate between Gene-neg, Gene-pos, and SPS cohorts based on microbial taxa.
  • <sup>1</sup>H NMR and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were used to quantify and analyze stool metabolites, assessing their predictive value for SPS.

Main Results

  • The mucosa-associated microbiota in colonic polyposis mirrors that of small polyps.
  • Gene-pos and SPS cohorts showed distinct microbiota populations compared to Gene-neg polyposis cohorts, with LDA achieving 89% and 93% accuracy in differentiation, respectively.
  • SPS subjects exhibited increased fecal alanine compared to non-polyposis individuals, and the leucine to tyrosine ratio in stool may predict SPS.

Conclusions

  • Microbial and metabolomic signatures can effectively differentiate between subtypes of colonic polyposis.
  • These findings suggest potential for developing advanced diagnostic and risk-stratification tools for colonic polyposis patients.
  • The identified signatures may pave the way for microbiome-targeted interventions aimed at polyp prevention.