Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

11:19
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
11.4K
Moldable and Particulate Bone Material in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Yiseul Choi1,2, Jieun Cheong1, Yoolbin Song1
1Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
|March 12, 2025
Summary
Moldable bone and particulate bone achieve similar alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) results. Histological analysis showed significantly more new bone formation with moldable bone, indicating its effectiveness in ARP.
Area of Science:
- Dental implantology and regenerative medicine.
- Bone grafting and tissue engineering for alveolar ridge preservation.
Background:
- Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is crucial for maintaining bone volume after tooth extraction, facilitating successful dental implant placement.
- Different bone graft materials are used for ARP, with varying histological and radiological outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the histological and radiological differences between moldable bone (SBX) and particulate bone (PBX) materials for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).
- To evaluate new bone formation, residual graft material, and connective tissue integration following ARP with two distinct bone graft types.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 39 patients (40 teeth) undergoing ARP post-extraction.
- Patients were assigned to receive either moldable bone (SBX) or particulate bone (PBX) grafts, covered with a collagen membrane.
- Radiological (Cone-beam computed tomography) and histomorphometric analyses were performed 5 months post-procedure.
Main Results:
- No significant radiological differences were observed in midbuccal alveolar bone height or horizontal ridge width between the SBX and PBX groups at 5 months.
- The SBX group demonstrated significantly higher percent new bone area (39.16%) compared to the PBX group (22.75%) (p < 0.001).
- The SBX group also showed a significantly lower percent residual material area (8.97%) versus the PBX group (15.63%) (p = 0.037).
Conclusions:
- Both moldable bone and particulate bone materials can achieve comparable alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) radiologically.
- Histological findings indicate superior new bone formation and reduced residual graft material when using moldable bone for ARP.
- Moldable bone presents a promising alternative for ARP, offering favorable bone regeneration characteristics.

