Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Serum drug levels and medication adherence in heart failure: A comparative cohort analysis
Libor Jelinek1, Martin Modrak2, Jan Vaclavik3
1Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Insights
Medication adherence in heart failure patients was assessed using serum drug levels. While most patients were adherent, the 2020 cohort showed lower adherence compared to 2018, despite similar heart failure severity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Medication adherence is crucial for managing chronic heart failure (HF).
- Direct methods like serum drug level testing offer objective adherence assessment.
- Understanding adherence trends over time is important for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare medication adherence in two heart failure patient cohorts.
- To evaluate changes in adherence between 2018 and 2020 using serum drug levels.
- To identify factors associated with adherence in HF patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, monocentric registry (LEVEL-CHF) was used.
- Two cohorts of stable HF with reduced ejection fraction patients were enrolled in 2018 and 2020.
- Serum drug levels were employed for direct adherence detection.
Main Results:
- 81% of patients were fully adherent; 19% showed varying degrees of non-adherence.
- The 2020 cohort demonstrated significantly lower medication adherence than the 2018 cohort (P<0.01).
- Increased BMI and fasting glycemia were observed in 2020 compared to 2018.
Conclusions:
- Most heart failure patients exhibited full medication adherence.
- Serum drug level testing is an effective adherence assessment tool in clinical practice.
- No significant clinical differences were found between adherent and non-adherent HF patients.
Objective:
To determine changes in medication adherence in two cohorts of heart failure patients differing by year of data collection and using a direct method of adherence detection - serum drug level testing.
Methods:
We added a second cohort of patients to a prospective monocentric registry of chronic heart failure patients (LEVEL-CHF registry). The two cohorts share the same inclusion criteria but differ by the year of enrolment (2018 and 2020). Stable patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were enrolled in a specialized university hospital center.
Results:
We included 402 records of 366 individual patients, 274 in 2018 and 128 in 2020. 36 patients were enrolled in both cohorts. Of the total 81% of patients were fully adherent, and 19% were non-adherent to a varying degree. Between 2018 and 2020 there was a statistically significant increase in BMI (P=0.047) and fasting glycemia (P=0.009). Patients in the 2020 cohort were less adherent than those in the 2018 cohort (P<0.01). Patients in the two cohorts had similarly severe heart failure and did not substantially differ in NYHA class. There were no statistically significant differences between adherent and non-adherent patients after adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Conclusions:
In this comparison, most patients were fully adherent to all their medication and very few were non-adherent to multiple medications. We found no clinically relevant differences between adherent and non-adherent patients. Serum drug level testing is an effective method of adherence testing in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
