Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer
Published on: May 18, 2020
Breast cancer preclinical models: a vital resource for comprehending disease mechanisms and therapeutic development
Ravneet Kaur1, Anuradha Sharma1, Nalaka Wijekoon2,3
1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab-144411, India.
Abstract:
A significant obstacle in translating innovative breast cancer treatments from bench to bed side is demonstrating efficacy in preclinical settings prior to clinical trials, as the heterogeneity of breast cancer can be challenging to replicate in the laboratory. A significant number of potential medicines have not progressed to clinical trials because preclinical models inadequately replicate the complexities of the varied tumor microenvironment. Consequently, the variety of breast cancer models is extensive, and the selection of a model frequently depends on the specific inquiry presented. This review aims to present an overview of the existing breast cancer models, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and challenges in the context of innovative drug discovery, thereby offering insights that may be advantageous to future translational studies. Conventional monolayer cultures are critical for elucidating the different breast cancer types and their behavior, have limitations in adequately replicating tumor environments. The 3D models such as patient-derived xenografts, cell-derived xenografts and genetically engineered models offer better insights by maintaining tumor microenvironments and cellular heterogeneity. Results can be further enhanced when compared with breast epithelial cells, a negative control to determine early stages by investigating differences between healthy and cancerous mammary cells. While cell lines such as MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 etc are useful in vitro models, they exhibit genetic variations that may affect drug responses over time. Additionally, animal models, particularly rodents, are instrumental in breast cancer research due to their biological resemblances to humans and the relative ease of genetic modification, however, witness a low occurrence of tumors. This review thus concludes that different preclinical models have their associated benefits and pitfalls. Therefore, specific preclinical models can be created by altering the gene expression at the genetic level or could be selected as per specific experimental needs which will enable successful translation of preclinical findings into clinical trials can be possible. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).
Insights
Selecting appropriate preclinical breast cancer models is crucial for drug discovery. This review examines various models, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to improve the translation of treatments from lab to clinic.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Translational Research
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Breast cancer heterogeneity poses challenges for preclinical research.
- Inadequate preclinical models hinder the translation of novel treatments to clinical trials.
- Existing models often fail to replicate the complex tumor microenvironment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing breast cancer models for drug discovery.
- To highlight the advantages, limitations, and challenges of each model.
- To provide insights for improving preclinical translational studies.
Main Methods:
- Overview of conventional monolayer cultures.
- Analysis of 3D models: patient-derived xenografts, cell-derived xenografts, genetically engineered models.
- Evaluation of in vitro cell lines (e.g., MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) and animal models (rodents).
Main Results:
- Monolayer cultures have limitations in replicating tumor environments.
- 3D models and xenografts better maintain tumor microenvironments and cellular heterogeneity.
- Cell lines can exhibit genetic variations affecting drug response; animal models have low tumor occurrence.
Conclusions:
- Different preclinical models offer distinct benefits and drawbacks.
- Tailoring model selection or creation based on experimental needs is vital.
- Optimizing preclinical models can enhance the successful translation of findings into clinical trials.

