Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Tissue Collection of Bats for -Omics Analyses and Primary Cell Culture
Published on: October 23, 2019
Beware of Plant DNA in Animal Dietary Metabarcoding: Lessons From a Strictly Insectivorous Bat
Luis P da Silva1,2, Miguel Porto1,2,3, Francisco Amorim1,2
1CIBIO, Centro de Investigação Em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal.
None:
DNA metabarcoding is increasingly used in dietary studies, but it has limitations, such as detecting nonfood taxa. This issue is frequently mentioned in the literature but poorly understood, limiting interpretation of results and mitigation strategies. We evaluate the extent and sources of nonfood plant DNA in dietary metabarcoding, based on 281 faecal samples of a strictly insectivorous bat. We modelled plant taxa detections in relation to pollination syndromes, flowering and fruiting phenology and habitat associations, and we estimated co-occurrences between plants and arthropods. The bat arthropod diet was consistent with previous studies. Plants were detected in 82.9% of samples, representing 148 taxa, and all pollination syndromes evaluated. Plant detections were more frequent during their flowering periods, particularly for those with mixed pollination syndromes, suggesting a relationship between flowering and detectability. Fruiting had a positive, albeit weaker, effect. There was a tendency for more frequent detection of forest plants and less frequent detection of plants associated with riparian and agricultural habitats. Co-occurrences between arthropods and plants were weak and inconsistent. Our results highlight the potential for widespread detection of nonfood plant DNA in metabarcoding studies, calling for great care when analysing the plant component of diets. Specifically, we recommend: (i) implementing strategies for reducing plant contamination during field sampling; (ii) using multiple field and lab negative controls; and (iii) using ancillary information (e.g., sample visual inspection and literature review) to aid interpretation of metabarcoding results. Moreover, we recommend that studies reporting plant consumption results greatly diverging from dietary patterns obtained through other methods should include detailed explanations of methodological steps taken to exclude the confounding effects of nonfood plant DNA.
More Related Videos
09:18Profiling the Triacylglyceride Contents in Bat Integumentary Lipids by Preparative Thin Layer Chromatography and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
Published on: September 5, 2013
12:11Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose
Published on: November 13, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Pollination and Flower Structure