Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin-Sulbactam in Azotemic and Non-Azotemic Dogs
Zhe Wang1, Sarah Shropshire1, Daniel Gustafson1
1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Abstract:
Previous research has shown that azotemic dogs have a lower clearance and higher drug plasma concentrations of ampicillin compared to healthy dogs. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam after multiple intravenous doses in hospitalized azotemic and non-azotemic dogs. This prospective study included 29 client-owned dogs; 19 azotemic and 10 non-azotemic. Ampicillin-sulbactam was administered at a combined dose of 22 mg/kg intravenously every 8 h for up to 5 days. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (prior to administration of the first dose of ampicillin-sulbactam), and 1-, 4-, and 8-h post-ampicillin-sulbactam administration each day. Plasma ampicillin was measured using LC-MS and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling and dose interval modeling were performed. Plasma ampicillin exposure (azotemic mean 214.5 ug/mL × h ± 110.8, non-azotemic mean 60.3 ± 35.7; p < 0.0009) and half-life (azotemic mean 3.9 h ± 2.4, non-azotemic mean 1.5 h ± 0.3; p < 0.00001) were statistically greater in azotemic dogs compared to non-azotemic dogs. Single dose interval modeling predicted that 100% of azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 2) with q12 h dosing and 79% of azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 8) with q12 h dosing. Comparatively, 20% of non-azotemic dogs were predicted to have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 2) with q12 h dosing and 0 non-azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 8) with q12 h dosing. This study demonstrated that q12-h dosing of ampicillin-sulbactam in azotemic dogs over multiple days of administration is sufficient to reach the PK-PD target (> 50% of dosing interval > MIC) against susceptible bacteria.
More Related Videos
11:17Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Nonlinearity can arise due to the saturation of plasma protein-binding or...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Bioavailability and Protein-Drug Binding
To quantify the extent of bioavailability, pharmacologists often use a parameter called .
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Causes of Nonlinearity
Nonlinear drug absorption can occur when the process is rate-limited by solubility, carrier-mediated transport systems, or saturation of the presystemic gut wall or hepatic metabolism. For instance, high doses of riboflavin...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Miscellaneous Pharmacokinetic Parameters
One key aspect of the noncompartmental approach is determining a drug's total clearance. This can be done by dividing the drug dose by the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity. The area under the concentration-time curve represents the drug's...
