Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Surgical Closure of Equine Abdomen, Prevention, and Management of Incisional Complications
Published on: May 10, 2024
Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improves Outcomes in Obese Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee
Johannes M Herold1, Isaiah Selkridge1, Allina A Nocon2
1Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital For Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Background:
The burden of revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) is increasing. Revision procedures are associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications. Obese patients undergoing rTJA may have a higher risk of wound complications due to their soft-tissue envelope. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been rigorously investigated for its effect on reducing wound complications; however, the literature is limited to primary total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the association between ciNPWT and clinical outcomes for obese patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study examining aseptic rTJA procedures from January 2017 to December 2021 at a high-volume institution. Patients were included if their body mass index was > 35 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The cohorts were rTJA procedures that used ciNPWT versus procedures without ciNPWT use. A total of 214 rTJA (Hip, n = 61; Knee, n = 153) patients qualified for analysis. After surgery, ciNPWT was applied on 130 (60.7%) patients (92 knees and 38 hips), and standard dressing was used on 84 (39.3%) patients (61 knees and 23 hips). There were no significant baseline differences between the groups. Outcomes evaluated were as follows: (1) revision for infection; (2) superficial wound complications; (3) overall complications; (4) all-cause revision; and (5) all-cause readmissions. The association between ciNPWT use and outcomes was evaluated using Chi-square tests.
Results:
When controlling for all variables, ciNPWT use was associated with significantly fewer revisions for infection (0.8 versus 8.3%), overall complications (3.8 versus 11.9%), all-cause revisions (3.1 versus 13.1%), and readmissions (10.8 versus 21.7%) compared to those who did not use ciNPWT. Secondary superficial wound complication-specific outcomes did not show significant differences.
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this study is the largest retrospective study to date examining the effect of ciNPWT on outcomes in obese aseptic revision rTJA patients. Our results demonstrated major benefits associated with the use of ciNPWT in obese patients undergoing aseptic rTJA in reference to infection-related revision, overall complications, all-cause revisions, and early readmission for any reason.
More Related Videos
00:20A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022