Comparative Assessment of Real-Time and Offline Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging of Ultrasound Breast Masses
Nethra Venkatayogi1, Arunima Sharma2, Emily B Ambinder3
1Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Objective:
To perform the first known investigation of differences between real-time and offline B-mode and short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) images when evaluating fluid or solid content in 60 hypoechoic breast masses.
Methods:
Real-time and retrospective (i.e., offline) reader studies were conducted with three board-certified breast radiologists, followed by objective, reader-independent discrimination using generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR).
Results:
The content of 12 fluid, solid and mixed (i.e., containing fluid and solid components) masses were uncertain when reading real-time B-mode images. With real-time and offline SLSC images, 15 and 5, respectively, aggregated solid and mixed masses (and no fluid masses) were uncertain. Therefore, with real-time SLSC imaging, uncertainty about solid masses increased relative to offline SLSC imaging, while uncertainty about fluid masses decreased relative to real-time B-mode imaging. When assessing real-time SLSC reader results, 100% (11/11) of solid masses with uncertain content were correctly classified with a gCNR<0.73 threshold applied to real-time SLSC images. The areas under receiver operator characteristic curves characterizing gCNR as an objective metric to discriminate complicated cysts from solid masses were 0.963 and 0.998 with real-time and offline SLSC images, respectively, which are both considered excellent for diagnostic testing.
Conclusion:
Results are promising to support real-time SLSC imaging and gCNR application to real-time SLSC images to enhance sensitivity and specificity, reduce reader variability, and mitigate uncertainty about fluid or solid content, particularly when distinguishing complicated cysts (which are benign) from hypoechoic solid masses (which could be cancerous).
