Identifying distinct prognostic and predictive contributions of tumor epithelium versus tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer
- Mingli Yang 1, Michael V Nebozhyn 2, Michael J Schell 3, Nishant Gandhi 4, Lance Pflieger 5, Andrey Loboda 2, W Jack Pledger 6,7, Ramani Soundararajan 8, Michelle Maurin 8, Heiman Wang 8, Jetsen Rodriguez Silva 8, Ashley Alden 8, Domenico Coppola 9,10, Andrew Elliott 4, George Sledge 4, Moh'd Khushman 11, Emil Lou 12, Sanjay Goel 13, Timothy J Yeatman 14,15,16
- 1Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA. mingliyang@usf.edu.
- 2Merck Research Laboratories, 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- 3Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- 4Medical Affairs, Caris Life Sciences, 4610 S 44th Pl, Phoenix, AZ, 85040, USA.
- 5Phenome Health, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
- 6Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- 7Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, 1 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.
- 8Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
- 9Department of Pathology, Florida Digestive Health Specialists, 10920 Technology Ter, Lakewood Ranch, FL, 34202, USA.
- 10Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- 11Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University, 4590 Nash Way, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
- 12Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
- 13Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA.
- 14Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA. tyeatman@usf.edu.
- 15Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. tyeatman@usf.edu.
- 16Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, 1 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA. tyeatman@usf.edu.
- 0Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 560 Channelside Drive, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA. mingliyang@usf.edu.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.New 10-gene signatures, EPI<sup>S</sup> and TME<sup>S</sup>, distinguish tumor epithelium and microenvironment contributions to colorectal cancer prognosis and treatment response, aiding therapy optimization.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Cancer Biology
Background
- Tumor progression and treatment response involve both tumor epithelium (EPI) and the tumor microenvironment (TME).
- The distinct contributions of EPI versus TME to clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain poorly defined and quantified.
Purpose Of The Study
- To develop and validate novel gene signatures that can differentiate the cellular contributions of the tumor EPI and TME.
- To assess the prognostic and predictive value of these signatures in colorectal cancer.
Main Methods
- Classified 2373 CRC tumors into consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4).
- Generated 10-gene TME<sup>S</sup> and EPI<sup>S</sup> signatures derived from a previously identified prognostic gene signature.
- Utilized CIBERSORT deconvolution and scRNASEQ for cellular feature identification and validation.
Main Results
- TME<sup>S</sup> signature associated with immune/stromal-rich, poor-prognosis CMS1/CMS4 subtypes and cancer-associated fibroblasts.
- EPI<sup>S</sup> signature linked to epithelial-rich, better-prognosis CMS2/CMS3 subtypes.
- EPI<sup>S</sup> scores correlated with improved progression-free survival in cetuximab-treated CRC patients and overall survival in EGFR inhibitor-treated patients.
Conclusions
- Identified distinct 10-gene EPI<sup>S</sup> and TME<sup>S</sup> signatures for differentiating tumor EPI and TME contributions to CRC outcomes.
- These signatures may serve as novel biomarkers for optimizing CRC therapy by identifying sensitive and resistant subpopulations.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

