Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

12.2K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
12.2K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

81
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
81
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

163
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
163
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.7K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultra-Fast Implementation of Multivariate GWAS in Genomic SEM Using Flexible Analytic Estimation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Moment-to-Moment Coordination of Parent-Infant Visual Attention: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Framework Within Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Estimated Factor Scores Are Not True Factor Scores.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

Nodewise Parameter Aggregation for Psychometric Networks.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same author

Pay Attention to the Ignorable Missing Data Mechanisms! An Exploration of Their Impact on the Efficiency of Regression Coefficients.

Multivariate behavioral research·2023
Same author

A causal theory of error scores.

Psychological methods·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

967

Exploring the Effects of Sampling Variability, Scale Variability, and Node Aggregation on the Consistency of

Arianne Herrera-Bennett1, Mijke Rhemtulla1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|March 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Network model replicability depends on measurement quality. Using multi-item indicators and larger samples improves consistency in network properties, enhancing generalizability across studies.

Keywords:
Network modelsgeneralizabilitymeasurement errorreplicabilitysampling variability

More Related Videos

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

967
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Science
  • Network Science
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Replicability and generalizability of network models are increasingly debated.
  • Methodological issues like single-item indicators and non-identical measures may cause inconsistencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disentangle sampling variability from scale variability in network replicability.
  • To explore if aggregating more items for node scores improves network characteristic consistency.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a resampling approach with empirical data.
  • Assessed network properties using varying sample sizes and node aggregation levels.

Main Results:

  • Scale variability introduced more network property discrepancies than sampling variability.
  • Discrepancies reduced with larger samples and increased node aggregation.
  • Multi-item indicators yielded denser networks, higher sensitivity, greater global strength, and more consistent network properties.

Conclusions:

  • Poor measurement conditions can cause variability in network properties across samples.
  • Variability may reflect true network structure or measurement instrument limitations.
  • Item aggregation is crucial for robust and replicable network analyses.