Absence of chest discomfort in type 1 NSTEMI patients: predictors and impact on outcome
J Michael Altstidl1, Merve Günes-Altan1, Maximilian Moshage1
1Department of Medicine 2 - Cardiology and Angiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Background:
The absence of chest discomfort has been hypothesized to delay treatment and consequently result in worse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Methods:
In 888 consecutive patients with type 1 NSTEMI, symptoms were systematically classified as chest discomfort defined as chest pain or pressure, dyspnea or other symptoms, e.g. epigastric pain. Patient characteristics predictive for the absence of chest discomfort and the impact of the symptom type on adverse in-hospital events (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, and mechanical ventilation) were analyzed.
Results:
Chest discomfort was reported in 81.0%, dyspnea without chest discomfort in 12.2%, and only other symptoms in the remaining 6.9% of patients. In a multivariable regression analysis, female sex (p = 0.035), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003), the absence of any family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (p = 0.002), anemia (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation or flutter at presentation (p = 0.017) were independent predictors for the absence of chest discomfort. The absence of chest discomfort was associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events (10.6% for chest discomfort vs. 29.6% for dyspnea and 27.9% for other symptoms, p < 0.001), which appeared partially mediated (p = 0.044) by longer times from diagnosis to invasive management (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
In type 1 NSTEMI, the absence of chest discomfort is associated with a higher rate of adverse in-hospital events. Women, diabetics, patients without a family history of CAD, patients with anemia, and patients with atrial fibrillation are more likely to present without chest discomfort and special attention may be required to avoid delayed invasive management in these patients.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...


