Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
Published on: April 21, 2017
Methodological Choices on 24-h Movement Behavior Assessment by Accelerometry: A Scoping Review
Bruno Rodrigues1,2,3,4, António Videira-Silva5, Luís Lopes6,7
1Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure), Porto, Portugal. brunocrodrigues94@gmai.com.
Current 24-hour movement behavior (MovBeh) studies using accelerometry show significant variation in measurement protocols and data processing. Establishing consensus is crucial for enhancing the precision and comparability of findings across diverse age groups.
Area of Science:
- Movement science
- Biomedical engineering
- Public health
Background:
- Limited synthesis of current measurement protocols for 24-hour movement behaviors (MovBeh) using accelerometry across the lifespan.
- Need for standardized methods to assess physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize accelerometry-based measurement protocols and processing decisions in 24-hour MovBeh studies.
- To cover the full age spectrum, from toddlers to older adults.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE up to December 2022.
- Inclusion of observational or intervention studies with 24-hour accelerometry protocols across all ages.
- Analysis of 102 studies, examining device usage, data collection duration, wear time criteria, epoch length, sleep/sedentary/physical activity algorithms, and participant compliance strategies.
Main Results:
- The Actigraph GT3X was the most utilized device, with most studies collecting 7-day data (including weekdays and weekend days) for ≥16 hours/day.
- Significant variability observed in non-wear time criteria (20-90 minutes of consecutive zero counts), epoch lengths (15s for youth, 60s for adults), and the choice of sleep/sedentary/physical activity algorithms.
- Exclusion of non-compliant participants was the primary strategy for managing data, with diaries/logs frequently used to supplement accelerometer data.
Conclusions:
- Accelerometer protocols and methodological decisions in 24-hour MovBeh studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity.
- A lack of consensus on methodological choices impedes study precision and comparability.
- Standardization is essential but challenging due to complex procedures, diverse accelerometer types, and numerous programming options.
Related Concept Videos
Average Acceleration
Instantaneous Acceleration
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Distance Problem

