Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment Effect Reanalysis of the Randomized Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma With External Control Data.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Classifying germline and somatic structural variants in tumor-only contexts using GaTSV.

STAR protocols·2026
Same author

MRE11 proximal polyadenylation site-mediated looping impacts transcription and genomic stability.

Molecular cell·2026
Same author

Reconstructing biologically coherent cellular profiles from imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Cre-mediated copy number variant compromises the reliability of a <i>LoxP-STOP-LoxP</i>-<i>PLAG1</i> driven brain tumor model.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

Evaluation of sex differences in survival among glioblastoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2025

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

19.4K

A sequence context-based approach for classifying tumor structural variants without paired normal samples.

Wolu Chukwu1, Siyun Lee1, Alexander Crane1

  • 1Cancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Cell Reports Methods
|March 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared germline and cancer structural variants (SVs), finding distinct genomic features. These differences enabled the development of "the great GaTSV" classifier to differentiate SVs in tumor samples.

Keywords:
CP: cancer biologyCP: geneticsWGScancerchromosomal rearrangementsgenomic structural variantsgermline and somatic structural variantsmachine learning classifier

More Related Videos

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
08:16

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

6.7K
Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

33.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

19.4K
Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
08:16

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

6.7K
Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

33.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Cancer Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Structural variants (SVs) are crucial in genome evolution and disease.
  • Previous studies analyzed germline and cancer SVs separately.
  • Comprehensive comparison of SV genomic contexts is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the genomic contexts of germline and cancer structural variants.
  • To identify differences in SV-generating processes and selective pressures.
  • To develop a classifier for distinguishing germline from cancer SVs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 2 million germline and 115 thousand tumor SVs from 963 The Cancer Genome Atlas patients.
  • Comparison of SV genomic sequences and localization features.
  • Development and validation of a machine learning classifier.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences observed in genomic sequence and localization features between germline and cancer SVs.
  • Germline SVs associated with transposon-mediated processes.
  • Somatic SVs frequently exhibit features of chromoanagenesis.
  • "the great GaTSV" classifier accurately distinguishes germline and cancer SVs.

Conclusions:

  • Germline and cancer structural variants arise from distinct genomic processes.
  • Genomic context analysis is key to understanding SV origins.
  • The "great GaTSV" classifier aids in SV identification in tumor samples without matched normal data.