Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Large Core Trial
Gianluca De Rubeis1, Sebastiano Fabiano2, Luca Bertaccini2
1From the Department of Diagnostic (G.D.R., S.F., L.B., E.P.), UOC of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy derubeis.gianluca@gmail.com.
Insights
Large-core stroke trials show mechanical thrombectomy benefits, but ASPECT score limitations may affect results. Perfusion imaging is superior to ASPECT score for assessing ischemic core and salvageable tissue in stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neurology
- Stroke Medicine
Background:
- Recent large-core Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluated mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
- Six RCTs demonstrated thrombectomy's superiority over medical treatment in patients with low ASPECTS scores.
- The use of ASPECTS ( a 10-point scale) to define the ischemic core has limitations, particularly for changes beyond the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze recent publications on large-core RCTs.
- To evaluate the implications of using ASPECTS for defining the ischemic core on the external validity of these trials.
- To compare the reliability of ASPECTS with perfusion imaging in assessing infarct core and salvageable brain tissue.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated ASPECTS reliability by examining occlusion location, collateral blood flow, and perfusion imaging.
- Compared data from the HERMES collaboration with six large-core RCTs.
- Investigated the effect of occlusion site on infarct size and salvageable brain tissue.
Main Results:
- RCTs showed a trend toward more proximal occlusions in large-core trials compared to the HERMES collaboration.
- ASPECTS inadequately depicted ischemic changes outside proximal MCA occlusions, potentially leading to misinterpretations.
- Perfusion imaging identified core volume and salvageable areas more accurately than ASPECTS alone.
Conclusions:
- Perfusion imaging is superior to ASPECTS for assessing infarct core and salvageable tissue in large-core stroke RCTs.
- Redefining infarct core assessment in large-core RCTs, prioritizing perfusion imaging over ASPECTS, is advocated.
- Further research is needed to refine imaging criteria for thrombectomy eligibility, considering occlusion site significance.
Abstract:
This review critically analyzed recent publications on large core randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six RCTs demonstrated the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy over the best medical treatment in patients with low ASPECTS. However, the use of ASPECTS to define the ischemic core has limitations in detecting ischemic changes beyond the MCA territory. This review evaluates the implications of this choice on the external validity of the trials. The study evaluated ASPECTS reliability by examining the anatomic details of occlusion location, collateral blood flow, and perfusion imaging. An analysis comparing the Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials (HERMES) collaboration with 6 RCTs on large core infarcts was conducted to investigate how the occlusion site affects infarct size and salvageable brain tissue, as well as to support pathophysiological assessment. RCTs indicated a trend toward more proximal occlusions in large core trials compared with HERMES collaboration, unpredictably increasing the mismatch between the ischemic core and salvageable tissue. ASPECTS inadequately depicted ischemic changes outside the proximal MCA occlusion, causing potential misinterpretations. Perfusion imaging identified core volume and salvageable areas better than ASPECTS alone by including all at-risk tissues, not just the MCA. This review advocates redefining infarct core assessment in large core RCTs, prioritizing perfusion imaging over ASPECTS. It emphasizes the significance of the occlusion site in large core stroke for clinical decisions and calls for research to refine the imaging criteria for thrombectomy eligibility.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Standards of Care II
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Standards of Care I