Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1.1K
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1.1K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A preliminary comparison of prosthetic socket liner strain determined using digital image correlation and finite element analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Age-Specific Clinical Biomarker Ranges in Acute Head Injury, Non-TBI Trauma, and Healthy Control Subjects in the Emergency Department.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2026
Same author

Distributions of plantar loads are altered when walking in anxiety-inducing virtual settings but not under cognitive demand.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Evaluating Emergency Department Transfers for Falls in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Single-Site Observational Study of Witnessed and Unwitnessed Falls.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2026
Same author

Development of a Fall-Specific Impact Testing Method to Evaluate Safety Helmet Performance and Injury Risk.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Sternum drop during trip recovery differs between the laboratory and real world - An exploratory pilot study.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
07:30

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact

Published on: September 21, 2017

8.9K

Uncalibrated Single-Camera View Video Tracking of Head Impact Speeds Using Model-Based Image Matching.

Nicole E-P Stark1, Ethan S Henley2,3, Brianna A Reilly3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 440 Kelly Hall, 325 Stanger Street MC 0298, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. nestark@vt.edu.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|March 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Model-based image matching (MBIM) accurately tracks head impact speeds from single-camera views without environment calibration. This method offers a viable solution for analyzing previously untraceable head impact videos.

Keywords:
Head impactsModel-based image matchingMotion trackingVideogrammetry

More Related Videos

Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems
08:38

Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems

Published on: April 18, 2019

30.3K
In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
06:14

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

Published on: April 18, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
07:30

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact

Published on: September 21, 2017

8.9K
Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems
08:38

Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems

Published on: April 18, 2019

30.3K
In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
06:14

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

Published on: April 18, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Science
  • Injury Prevention

Background:

  • Assessing head impact kinematics is crucial for understanding injury mechanisms.
  • Traditional motion capture systems require extensive calibration and multiple cameras.
  • There is a need for accurate, accessible methods to analyze head impacts in uncalibrated environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of model-based image matching (MBIM) with model calibration for tracking head impact speeds.
  • To determine the feasibility of using MBIM from single-camera views in uncalibrated spaces.
  • To compare MBIM accuracy against established measurement systems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two validation datasets: guided NOCSAE headform drops and participant ladder falls.
  • Employed a 12-camera motion capture system for the participant falls.
  • Tracked head impact speeds frame-by-frame using MBIM software and a 3D headform model.
  • Assessed accuracy via mean difference and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).

Main Results:

  • MBIM showed minimal error in ideal camera views (RMSE 0.15 m/s).
  • Across all NOCSAE videos, MBIM vertical speeds had an RMSE of 0.19 m/s.
  • Participant fall speeds tracked by MBIM had an RMSE of 0.31 m/s compared to motion capture.

Conclusions:

  • MBIM with model calibration provides reasonable accuracy for analyzing head impact kinematics from single-camera footage.
  • The approach eliminates the need for environment calibration, enhancing accessibility.
  • This technique opens opportunities for analyzing previously untraceable head impact data.