Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
Process evaluation of a complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication care in Germany: a mixed
Sarah Anna Katharina Uthoff1, Anna Zinkevich2,3, Jens Boenisch4
1Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl Von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstrasse 140, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany. sarah.uthoff@uni-oldenburg.de.
A new complex intervention improved augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) system use for individuals without natural speech. Caregivers and consultants rated the intervention positively, showing higher acceptance and competence in the intervention group.
Area of Science:
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
- Healthcare Interventions
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Lack of clear care pathways for AAC in Germany hinders sustainable implementation.
- A complex intervention was developed to support AAC users, including training, therapy, and case management.
- This study evaluates the process of this complex intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a complex intervention for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
- To assess caregiver and consultant ratings of the intervention.
- To identify contextual factors influencing AAC implementation and system use.
Main Methods:
- Mixed methods design utilizing longitudinal surveys of caregivers and semi-structured focus group interviews.
- Quantitative analysis involved descriptive statistics and nonparametric comparisons.
- Qualitative analysis employed structured qualitative content analysis.
Main Results:
- Intervention elements, including AAC training, therapy, and case management, were positively rated.
- The intervention facilitated effective AAC system use in various contexts.
- Higher acceptance, use competence, and system utilization were observed in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Conclusions:
- Contextual factors significantly influence the implementation of AAC interventions.
- The evaluated intervention shows potential for improving AAC care and promoting sustainable system use.
- Findings offer insights for adapting AAC interventions for successful real-world implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

