Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025
Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: January 29, 2016
Acceptance and trust in AI-generated exercise plans among recreational athletes and quality evaluation by experienced
Felix Wachholz1, Stefano Manno2, Daniel Schlachter2
1Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Fürstenweg 185, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria. felix.wachholz@uibk.ac.at.
Objectives:
Large language models are becoming increasingly significant tools in everyday life, including the context of training and sports. However, the extent to which recreational athletes actually rely on AI-generated training plans and the differences in trust towards these technologies between users and non-users have not yet been investigated. Furthermore, there is a lack of information regarding the current quality of such AI-generated training plans. The aim of this project was to examine how users and non-users differ in their trust towards these technologies and to assess the quality of AI-generated training plans.
Results:
In our sample, 54% of the participants trained using a structured training plan, with 25% of those utilizing AI-generated training plans. Users of these AI-based tools exhibited significantly (p = 0.030) higher levels of trust in these technologies compared to non-users. The quality of the output from large language models has now reached a level where even professional coaches are often unable to distinguish whether a training plan was AI-generated or created by a human expert. This suggests that AI-generated training plans could potentially match the standards of those developed by experienced coaches, making them a viable option for athletes seeking guidance in their training.
