Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Untangling profiles of postthrombotic syndrome using unsupervised machine learning.
Aaron F J Iding1,2,3, Vincent Ten Cate4,5,6, Hugo Ten Cate1,2,3,4
1Thrombosis Expertise Center, Heart and Vascular Center, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Machine learning identified four distinct patient profiles for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Reappraising the Villalta scale to separate signs and symptoms could personalize PTS risk prediction and prevention.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Medical Informatics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic condition following deep vein thrombosis (DVT), characterized by heterogeneity.
- The Villalta scale is used for PTS diagnosis, but its ability to capture patient heterogeneity is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply unsupervised machine learning to identify distinct PTS patient profiles.
- To investigate the heterogeneity within the Villalta scale by distinguishing between signs and symptoms.
Main Methods:
- Unsupervised clustering was applied to 818 patients from the IDEAL-DVT study.
- Villalta scale items were clustered to differentiate between signs and symptoms.
- Associations with clinical factors, residual venous obstruction, quality of life, and longitudinal outcomes were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Four distinct patient profiles emerged: younger patients with provoked DVT, women with joint pain, men with isolated popliteal DVT, and older men with diabetes and femoral vein involvement.
- Villalta scale clustering clearly separated signs and symptoms.
- Sign scores correlated with older age, male sex, higher BMI, and DVT extent, while symptom scores correlated with younger age, female sex, higher BMI, and provoked DVT.
- Residual venous obstruction was linked to sign scores, whereas quality of life was more strongly related to symptom scores.
- Sign and symptom scores varied significantly across profiles and over two years, with distinct trajectories for symptom-dominant (profile 1) and sign-dominant (profile 4) groups.
Conclusions:
- PTS exhibits significant patient heterogeneity that can be identified using machine learning.
- The Villalta scale's sign and symptom dimensions are distinct and differentially associated with clinical factors, outcomes, and quality of life.
- Revising the PTS scoring system to differentiate signs and symptoms may enable more personalized risk prediction and prevention strategies for patients with DVT.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:21Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022