Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Prioritizing tidal marsh restoration in grazing lands
Rocio Araya-Lopez1, Hugh P Possignham2, Melissa Wartman3
1Deakin Marine Research and Innovation Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood Campus, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Fencing tidal marshes can restore ecosystem services, but site selection is key. Prioritizing areas for restoration and adaptation to sea-level rise is crucial for effective conservation and management.
Area of Science:
- Coastal ecology
- Ecosystem services assessment
- Spatial planning
Background:
- Intensive grazing has degraded tidal marshes globally, impacting ecosystem functions and services.
- Fencing offers a cost-effective method for tidal marsh restoration and protecting inland migration corridors against sea-level rise.
- Limited funding and poor site selection impede large-scale restoration efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify priority areas for tidal marsh restoration and creation using Marxan, a decision support tool.
- To evaluate scenarios for recovering ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration, fisheries enhancement, and coastal hazard mitigation.
- To assess the impact of different target levels and management costs on restoration site selection.
Main Methods:
- Application of the Marxan decision support tool for spatial prioritization.
- Testing of multiple scenarios for ecosystem service recovery targets (30% total, 30% individual).
- Sensitivity analysis by varying recovery targets (10%, 20%) to assess site selection robustness.
Main Results:
- Fencing 26% of collapsed marsh and 22% of future inundated areas can restore ~30% of total ecosystem services.
- High-priority restoration sites were concentrated in West Gippsland (43%) and Melbourne Water (36%) regions.
- Spatial priorities varied significantly based on ecosystem services targeted and recovery levels, revealing trade-offs.
Conclusions:
- Strategic fencing and site selection are vital for maximizing ecosystem service recovery in tidal marshes.
- Planners must carefully consider trade-offs between different ecosystem services when prioritizing restoration.
- Further research should refine ecosystem service quantification, especially for coastal hazard mitigation, and include site condition and opportunity costs.
Related Concept Videos
Keystone Species
Threats to Biodiversity
Habitat Fragmentation
Ecological Succession
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Bioremediation

