Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Developing and Applying the BE-FAIR Equity Framework to a Population Health Predictive Model: A Retrospective
Reshma Gupta1,2, Mayu Sasaki3, Sandra L Taylor4
1Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California (UC) Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. R44gupta@gmail.com.
Background:
Population health programs rely on healthcare predictive models to allocate resources, yet models can perpetuate biases that exacerbate health disparities among marginalized communities.
Objective:
We developed the Bias-reduction and Equity Framework for Assessing, Implementing, and Redesigning (BE-FAIR) healthcare predictive models, an applied framework tested within a large health system using a population health predictive model, aiming to minimize bias and enhance equity.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Data collected from September 30, 2020, to October 1, 2022, were analyzed to assess bias resulting from model use.
Participants:
Primary care or payer-attributed patients at the medical center identified through electronic health records and claims data. Participants were stratified by race-ethnicity, gender, and social vulnerability defined by the Healthy Places Index (HPI).
Intervention:
BE-FAIR implementation involved steps such as an anti-racism lens application, de-siloed team structure, historical intervention review, disaggregated data analysis, and calibration evaluation.
Main Measures:
The primary outcome was the calibration and discrimination of the model across different demographic groups, measured by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results:
The study population consisted of 114,311 individuals with a mean age of 43.4 years (SD 24.0 years), 55.4% female, and 59.5% white/Caucasian. Calibration differed by race-ethnicity and HPI with significantly lower predicted probabilities of hospitalization for African Americans (0.129±0.051, p=0.016), Hispanics (0.133±0.047, p=0.004), AAPI (0.120±0.051, p=0.018), and multi-race (0.245±0.087, p=0.005) relative to white/Caucasians and for individuals in low HPI areas (0 - 25%, 0.178±0.042, p<0.001; 25 - 50%, 0.129±0.044, p=0.003). AUROC values varied among demographic groups.
Conclusions:
The BE-FAIR framework offers a practical approach to address bias in healthcare predictive models, guiding model development, and implementation. By identifying and mitigating biases, BE-FAIR enhances the fairness and equity of healthcare delivery, particularly for minoritized groups, paving the way for more inclusive and effective population health strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Concepts of Health and Illness

