Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

In vivo Imaging of Deep Cortical Layers using a Microprism
Published on: August 27, 2009
Prism and Maddox rod test as a reliable tool for surgical targeting in small-angle AACE
Longxiang Huang1,2,3,4, Jinghan Wu5, Huihang Wang1,2,3,4
1Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Bayiqi Middle Road No. 15 Nearby, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
Abstract:
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the prism and Maddox rod test (PMT) in determining surgical targets for small-angle acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE). Thirty-three patients with small-angle AACE who underwent surgical treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from June 2017 to May 2023 were included. All patients underwent various tests, including the Hirschberg test (HT), PMT, and prism and alternative cover test (PACT). PACT measured the minimum value (PACTmin) and the maximum value (PACTmax) based on different interpretation criteria for examination endpoint. PMT results were used as the surgical target. Unilateral medial rectus recession (MRrec) was performed on all patients, and postoperative follow-up lasted up to 6 months to evaluate deviation angle and binocular vision. Both near and distance measurements from PMT were 23.67 ± 5.44 PD and 24.82 ± 5.49 PD, respectively, which were comparable to PACTmax (23.06 ± 2.65 PD and 23.58 ± 2.35 PD) and significantly higher than PACTmin (15.18 ± 5.12 PD and 15.24 ± 5.06 PD; P < 0.001). Post-surgery, the mean deviation angles for distance and near viewing were reduced to 0.73 ± 1.69 PD and 0.61 ± 1.35 PD (PMT and PACTmin, respectively). All patients achieved excellent surgical outcomes, with no noticeable deviation angles, diplopia disappearance, and restoration of normal binocular vision. Our study demonstrates that PMT serves as a reliable and practical method for determining surgical targets in patients with small-angle AACE. The results highlight its accuracy and consistency in measuring deviation angles, which can effectively guide unilateral MRrec.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

