Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Development of heart-sparing VMAT radiotherapy technique incorporating heart substructures for advanced NSCLC
Linda Agolli1, Ann-Katrin Exeli2, Uwe Schneider2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen-Marburg University Hospital, Giessen, Klinikstraße, Germany. linda.agolli@radiol.med.uni-giessen.de.
Objective:
To investigate the feasibility of active heart sparing (AHS) planning in patients with locally advanced and centrally located NSCLC receiving standard definitive radiotherapy (RT), while maintaining or improving appropriate lung, esophagus, and spinal cord constraints and planning target volume (PTV) coverage intent.
Methods And Materials:
A total of 27 patients with stage IIIA/B NSCLC treated with curative intent RT were selected for this analysis. All existing radiation plans were revised and 27 further new equivalent plans were calculated using AHS for the same cohort of patients. Primary end-point was feasibility of AHS using constraints for heart substructures. The secondary end point was to calculate the difference in terms of dosimetric parameters of heart substructures and principal OARs as well as PTV-coverage parameters within the current patient group.
Results:
AHS was feasible in the entire group of patients. An optimal coverage of the target volume was obtained and all mandatory constraints for OARs have been met. The median value of the mean heart dose (MHD) was 8.18 Gy and 6.71 Gy in the standard planning group and AHS-group, respectively (p = 0.000). Other heart parameters such as V5Gy (40.57% vs. 27.7%; p = 0.000) and V30Gy (5.39% vs. 3.86%; p = 0.000) were significantly worse in the standard planning group. The following relevant dosimetric parameters regarding heart substructures were found to be significantly worse in the standard planning group compared to the AHS-group: median dose to heart base (16.97 Gy vs. 6.37 Gy, p = 0.000), maximum dose (18.64 Gy vs. 6.05 Gy, p = 0.000) and V15Gy (11.11% vs. 0% p = 0.000) to LAD; mean dose; V5Gy (9.55% vs. 0.94%, p = 0.000) and V23Gy (0.00% vs. 0.00% maximum 45.68% vs. 6.57%, p = 0.002 to the left ventricle.
Conclusion:
Our analysis showed an improvement of dosimetric parameters of the heart and heart substructures in patients affected by locally advanced and centrally located NSCLC treated with curative RT using AHS optimization. This approach could lead to a possible reduction of heart events and a prolonged survival. New clinical studies regarding RT in advanced NSCLC should include cardiologic evaluations and biomarkers as well as the contouring of cardiac substructures.
