Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
A Mixed Method Pilot Feasibility Study of a Symptom Management Support Intervention for Heart Transplant Recipients
Marita Dalvindt1,2, Hannah Lindahl-Veungen2, Annika Kisch1,3
1Institute of Health Sciences at Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Background:
The aim of heart transplantation is prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Chronic pain is a common and distressing symptom after heart transplantation. To our knowledge, there are no person-centred interventions aimed at chronic pain and symptom distress after heart transplantation. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of systematic, person-centred symptom management support for heart recipients with chronic pain to reduce symptom distress.
Methods:
A mixed method prospective pilot feasibility study. A one-group, pre-test/post-test design examined the effect of a symptom management support intervention by means of three consecutive 1-h person-centred supportive conversations about the heart recipient's experienced ability to manage her or his symptoms, self-efficacy and transplant-specific well-being. In total, 13 participants completed the intervention, 7 women and 6 men, with a mean age of 54.38 years. The feasibility was evaluated by semi-structured interviews analysed after the intervention in accordance with phenomenological hermeneutics, while four different instruments were used to quantitatively evaluate pain, self-efficacy, person-centeredness and transplant-specific well-being both before and after the intervention.
Results:
The intervention constituted a profound experience of being taken seriously based on four themes. The heart recipients experienced both sameness and otherness through reduced asymmetry in the caring encounter; thus, their dignity as persons capable of interpreting their own health was restored. Transplant-specific well-being improved clinically after the intervention, while basic activities of daily life improved significantly (p = 0.014). Although there was no change in self-efficacy, the self-rated experience of being taken seriously improved. There was a moderate relationship between transplant-specific well-being and self-efficacy before the intervention, rho 0.52 (p = 0.066) and a strong relationship after the intervention, rho 0.84 (p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Three 1-h consecutive person-centred conversations to support symptom management after heart transplantation constitute a relevant, feasible and effective intervention.
More Related Videos
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
09:38Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016