Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Validation of data capture in the Australasian shunt registry with a prospectively maintained institutional database
Michael J Stuart1, Alison Wray2, Mark Dexter3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.
Insights
The Australasian Shunt Registry accurately captures patient demographics and clinical outcomes for cerebrospinal fluid shunts, validating its use in research. This ensures reliable data for improving patient care and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- The Australasian Shunt Registry (ASR) was established to collect safety and quality data for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts.
- Queensland Children's Hospital, a major contributor to the ASR, maintains its own institutional shunt database.
- This study aimed to validate ASR data against the hospital's independent database.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of demographic data and clinical outcomes recorded in the ASR.
- To compare the ASR's data with a comprehensive institutional database from a large pediatric center.
- To determine the representativeness of ASR data for research purposes.
Main Methods:
- Data from January 2017 to October 2024 were compared between the ASR and the institutional database for pediatric patients (≤18 years) receiving new ventriculoperitoneal shunts.
- Demographic data, shunt revision rates, and mortality were analyzed.
- Kaplan-Meier curves and statistical tests (Wilcoxon, log-rank) were used to compare shunt survival (time to revision).
Main Results:
- The ASR reported a 9.5% opt-out rate; 344 patients were in the institutional database and 294 in the ASR sample.
- Demographics were similar: mean age 5 years, 44% female.
- Hydrocephalus etiologies, mortality (13% vs 11%), and revision rates (34% vs 32%) showed no significant differences between the datasets.
- Shunt survival was comparable: 4.82 years (institutional) vs 5.25 years (ASR), with no statistically significant difference (p=0.3).
Conclusions:
- The Australasian Shunt Registry captures a valid and representative sample of pediatric patients with CSF shunts.
- The ASR data accurately reflects the demographics and clinical outcomes of patients treated at contributing institutions.
- Continued efforts to ensure comprehensive data capture are crucial for the ASR's future research utility.
Background:
The Australasian Shunt Registry was established in 2016 with the aim of providing safety and quality data in addition to enhancing capacity for research to improve health outcomes for patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. The Queensland Children's Hospital is the largest single contributor of paediatric patient data to the Registry and maintains an independent institutional shunt database. The aim of this study was to validate the demographic data and outcomes captured by the Registry against that institutional database.
Methods:
Data from the institutional database and a sample of data from the same institution held by the Australasian Shunt Registry were acquired from the period of 1 January 2017 to 1 October 2024. Patients ≤ 18 years of age undergoing placement of a new ventriculoperitoneal shunt system were included. Revision and mortality data were acquired from the Australasian Shunt Registry and Queensland statewide electronic medical records independently. Comparison was made between demographic and mortality data captured by each database. The primary outcome of time to shunt revision (shunt survival) in each sample was assessed through the generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and analysis by both Wilcoxon and log-rank tests.
Results:
Over the study period the shunt registry reported a full or partial opt-out rate of 9.5 %. 344 patients were identified and included from the institutional database, and 294 patients were included from the Registry. The identified patient samples were demographically similar with a mean age of 5 years, and 44 % female in both groups. The most common aetiologies of hydrocephalus in both cohorts were congenital (28 % vs 28 %, p = 0.49), tumour (33 % vs 27 %, p = 0.08) and haemorrhage (25 % vs 18 %, p = 0.02). Mortality during followup was consistent across both samples (13 % vs 11 %, p = 0.27). Similarly, binary revision status during the followup period was similar (34 % vs 32 %, p = 0.3). Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to revision (shunt survival) estimated shunt survival to be 4.82 years (95 % CI 4.42--5.22 years) in the institutional database and 5.25 (95 % CI 4.81-5.69 years) in the Registry with no significant differences between the samples on Wilcoxon, p = 0.3 or late Log-Rank, p = 0.36 tests.
Conclusions:
The Australasian Shunt Registry appears to capture a valid sample which is representative of the demographics and clinical outcomes of patients treated at one large contributing institution. Ongoing efforts to ensure comprehensive data capture at all participating sites are justified to ensure that future findings derived from Registry data are representative of the studied population.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Reporting and Recording
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

