Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Endothelialized Microfluidics for Studying Microvascular Interactions in Hematologic Diseases
Published on: June 22, 2012
Crizanlizumab with or without hydroxyurea in patients with sickle cell disease (STAND): primary analyses from a
Miguel R Abboud1, Rodolfo D Cançado2, Mariane De Montalembert3
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Background:
Crizanlizumab has previously shown efficacy as a potent disease-modifying therapy for alleviating vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell disease. The SUSTAIN study showed a reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in patients treated with 5 mg/kg crizanlizumab, compared with placebo. The STAND study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses (5·0 mg/kg and 7·5 mg/kg) of crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease. Herein, we report the primary analysis results of STAND.
Methods:
STAND is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study of patients with sickle cell disease aged 12 years and older done at 65 sites in 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either 5·0 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, 7·5 mg/kg of crizanlizumab, or placebo, in addition to standard of care, for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises leading to a health-care visit over the first-year post-randomisation. The secondary objectives included assessing crizanlizumab's safety. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03814746) and is ongoing.
Findings:
Between July 26, 2019, and Aug 31, 2022, 252 patients were enrolled and treated. The primary analysis showed an adjusted annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises of 2·49 (95% CI 1·90-3·26) in the crizanlizumab 5·0 mg/kg group, 2·04 (1·56-2·65) in the 7·5 mg/kg group, and 2·30 (1·75-3·01) in the placebo group. Ratios of adjusted annualised rates of vaso-occlusive crises leading to health-care visits were 1·08 (95% CI 0·76-1·55, p>0·999) for 5·0 mg/kg and 0·89 (0·62-1·27, p>0·999) for 7·5 mg/kg vs placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed less frequently in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (27 [32%] of 85 and 32 [39%] of 83, respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (47 [56%] of 84). Serious adverse events (all grades) were also less frequent in the placebo and crizanlizumab 7·5 mg/kg groups (26 [31%] and 22 [27%], respectively) than in the 5·0 mg/kg group (35 [42%]).
Interpretation:
The STAND study supports the safety and tolerability of crizanlizumab in the treatment of sickle cell disease. The primary analysis showed no significant difference in efficacy between crizanlizumab and placebo. Factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, global enrolment with varied patterns of health-care use and vaso-occlusive crisis management as well as the commercial availability of crizanlizumab might have influenced these results. The safety profile of crizanlizumab was consistent with that in previous reports, without new safety concerns.
Funding:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
More Related Videos
06:14Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Published on: October 15, 2017
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids