Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Hemorrhagic Shock Research
Published on: March 22, 2024
Mortality time frame variability in septic shock clinical trials: A systematic review
Andres Laserna1, John A Cuenca2, Peyton Martin3
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States.
Objective:
We sought to delineate the mortality outcome time frames reported in septic shock randomized control trials (RCTs).
Design:
Systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Setting:
Intensive care units.
Participants:
Studies that included adult patients with septic shock.
Interventions:
Any type of intervention.
Main Variables Of Interest:
Information about the study, specific patient population, type of study intervention, specific intervention, and number of patients. Mortality time frames were analyzed for geographical differences and changes over time.
Results:
The search yielded 2660 unique citations. After screening, 132 eligible studies were identified. A total of 234 mortality time frames were collected from the included studies, of which 15 timeframes were unique. The most frequently reported time frame was 28-day mortality (n = 98, 74% of trials), followed by hospital mortality (n = 35, 27%), ICU mortality (n = 30, 23%), and 90-day mortality (n = 29, 22%). The most reported mortality time frame was 28 days in studies from every continent except Africa. The studies published between 2008 and 2013 (25%) more frequently reported hospital and ICU mortality combination than studies published between 2014 and 2019 (11.4%) (P = 0.043).
Conclusions:
There was considerable variability in the mortality time frames reported in ICU-based septic shock trials. This variability may lead to under or overestimation of the problem, overlooking the effectiveness of the interventions studied, and further limiting the application of trials and their pooling in meta-analyses. A consensus regarding time frame reporting in septic shock trials is long overdue.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Rate
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...

