Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Unsolicited medical opinion.

R M Ratzan

    The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    "Physicians must abandon the illusion of autonomy . . .".

    Pediatric cardiology·1998
    Same author

    Broken wings, mandalas, impaired physicians, and medical examining boards.

    The Journal of emergency medicine·1997
    Same author

    Laughter in the temple of pain and illness.

    The Journal of emergency medicine·1996
    Same author

    Judgement versus professional responsibility.

    The Journal of emergency medicine·1993
    Same author

    A Greek progymnasma on the physician-poisoner.

    Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences·1993
    Same author

    Winged words and chief complaints: medical case histories and the Parry-Lord oral-formulaic tradition.

    Literature and medicine·1992
    Same journal

    Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    See all related articles

    Physicians should offer unsolicited medical opinions to strangers when a serious, latent disease is suspected. This ethical obligation, based on professional expertise, can prevent suffering and save lives, despite privacy concerns.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Clinical Practice
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Physicians possess unique knowledge and skills for emergency assessment.
    • Professional ethics guide physician conduct in patient care.
    • Identifying potential health risks in strangers presents ethical dilemmas.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define the ethical obligation of physicians to offer unsolicited medical opinions.
    • To establish criteria for intervening when a stranger may have a serious, latent condition.
    • To explore the balance between patient privacy and the duty to prevent harm.

    Main Methods:

    • The study is a theoretical and ethical analysis.
    • It outlines specific conditions under which an unsolicited opinion is warranted.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsConsequencesPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It considers potential ethical risks and benefits.

    • Main Results:

    • Physicians have an obligation to offer unsolicited medical opinions under specific circumstances.
    • These circumstances involve assessing a high probability of serious, latent disease in a stranger.
    • The physician must possess the relevant medical knowledge for interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Offering unsolicited medical opinions can prevent suffering and save lives.
    • This ethical duty must be balanced against concerns of privacy invasion and iatrogenic "sick role" creation.
    • Physicians should act when specific criteria for potential serious, latent disease are met.