Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

16.4K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
16.4K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

48.8K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
48.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineering plasmids with synthetic origins of replication.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

On Degradation-Induced Leak in Heterochiral DNA Strand Displacement Cascades.

ACS synthetic biology·2026
Same author

A bumpy road ahead for genetic biocontainment.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Heterochiral modifications enhance robustness and function of DNA in living human cells.

Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology·2024
Same author

A geometric framework for reaction enumeration in computational nucleic acid devices.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2023
Same author

Operant conditioning of stochastic chemical reaction networks.

PLoS computational biology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2025

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
10:46

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

1.6K

A Study of CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Displacement in Cell-Free Systems.

Randi L Smith1, Peter W Davenport2,1, Matthew R Lakin2,3

  • 1Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States.

ACS Omega
|March 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

CRISPR/Cas systems offer precise gene control. Researchers explored using RNA strand displacement to remove CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins from DNA, but found dCas9 resistant to this method in cell-free systems.

More Related Videos

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

27.3K
Electroporation-Based CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockout in THP-1 Cells and Single-Cell Clone Isolation
09:32

Electroporation-Based CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockout in THP-1 Cells and Single-Cell Clone Isolation

Published on: February 28, 2025

575

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2025

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
10:46

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

1.6K
Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems
11:53

Substrate Generation for Endonucleases of CRISPR/Cas Systems

Published on: September 8, 2012

27.3K
Electroporation-Based CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockout in THP-1 Cells and Single-Cell Clone Isolation
09:32

Electroporation-Based CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockout in THP-1 Cells and Single-Cell Clone Isolation

Published on: February 28, 2025

575

Area of Science:

  • Synthetic Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • CRISPR/Cas systems are programmable tools for gene expression control in cellular and cell-free environments.
  • RNA engineering offers potential for dynamic control of CRISPR/Cas transcription factor activity.
  • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) using catalytically inactive dCas9 is a method to repress gene expression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the use of RNA strand displacement systems for removing CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes from target DNA in cell-free systems.
  • To engineer an antisense RNA to trigger rapid removal of bound CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoproteins via strand displacement.
  • To assess the efficacy of RNA strand displacement for dynamic control of dCas9 binding.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an *E. coli*-based cell-free expression system.
  • Engineered a guide RNA with an extended toehold.
  • Expressed an antisense RNA complementary to the guide RNA's toehold to induce strand displacement.
  • Monitored dCas9 binding via CRISPR interference repression of a reporter protein.

Main Results:

  • CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes, specifically dCas9, demonstrated significant resistance to removal by the designed RNA strand displacement system.
  • The antisense RNA did not effectively displace bound dCas9 from the target DNA in the cell-free system.
  • The study highlights unexpected stability of dCas9 binding under these conditions.

Conclusions:

  • RNA strand displacement, as implemented, is not an effective strategy for the dynamic removal of bound dCas9 in cell-free systems.
  • The observed resistance of dCas9 suggests limitations of this approach for rapid, on-demand deactivation of CRISPR/Cas transcription factors.
  • Alternative strategies may be required for achieving dynamic control and efficient removal of CRISPR/Cas proteins in engineered genetic networks.