Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
The Global Health Security Index and Its Role in Shaping National COVID‑19 Response Capacities: A Scoping Review
Danik Iga Prasiska1, Kennedy Mensah Osei1, Durga Datta Chapagain1
1Global Health Security, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Insights
The Global Health Security Index (GHSI) does not fully predict a country's ability to handle the COVID-19 pandemic. This health security tool needs to include more factors for better pandemic preparedness assessment.
Area of Science:
- Global Health Security
- Pandemic Preparedness
- International Relations
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted critical gaps in global health security frameworks.
- The Global Health Security Index (GHSI) was introduced to assess national preparedness.
- Robust health security measures are essential for managing global health crises.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of literature on the GHSI.
- To analyze national COVID-19 responses in relation to GHSI scores.
- To assess the predictive reliability of the GHSI for pandemic response.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search across major databases (EBSCO, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) from 2020-2024.
- Adherence to PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews.
- Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies.
Main Results:
- 20 studies were included from 3,243 identified articles.
- Analysis focused on detection, mortality, transmission, fatality, and recovery parameters.
- Significant discrepancies observed between GHSI scores and actual COVID-19 response effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- The GHSI's predictive reliability for pandemic response is questionable.
- The GHSI is valuable for identifying preparedness gaps but requires enhancement.
- Future iterations should incorporate political leadership, governance, and socio-cultural factors.
Abstract:
Introduction: Following the introduction of the Global Health Security Index (GHSI), the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic emerged as an unprecedented global health crisis, underscoring the need for robust health security frameworks and preparedness measures. This study conducts a scoping review to analyze the existing literature on the GHSI and assess national COVID‑19 responses across different countries. Method: A comprehensive search of electronic databases (EBSCO, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) was conducted for articles published from 2020 to 2024. Search terms included "Global Health Security Index" and terms related to COVID‑19. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‑ScR) guidelines. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), adjusted for cross‑sectional studies, was used for quality assessment. Results: A total of 3,243 studies were identified, of which 20 were finalized for data synthesis. Specific COVID‑19 parameters were analyzed to provide a comprehensive overview of each country's pandemic response capacity. Among the selected studies, 17 (85%) had a low risk of bias, while 3 (15%) had a medium risk. Countries' response capacities were categorized into five key parameters: detection, mortality, transmission, fatality, and recovery. Findings revealed significant discrepancies between GHSI scores and actual national responses, with some high‑scoring countries struggling to control the pandemic. This raises concerns about the GHSI's predictive reliability. Conclusion: The study highlights that the GHSI does not fully capture a country's capacity to respond effectively to COVID‑19. However, it remains a valuable tool for identifying gaps in pandemic preparedness. To enhance its relevance, the index should integrate a wider range of factors, including political leadership, governance, public health infrastructure, and socio‑cultural elements, which are crucial in managing public health emergencies.
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

