Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Psychometric properties of instruments for assessing adherence to oral antineoplastic agents: a COSMIN systematic
Miaomiao Sun1, Kanghui Huang1, Suxiang Liu1
1Department of Nursing, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Introduction:
Oral antineoplastic therapies have increasingly become a mainstay therapy for various cancers. Selecting the most suitable instrument for assessing adherence to oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) in cancer patients is crucial to tracking patients' medication compliance. This review is the first to identify available instruments for assessing adherence to OAAs and examine the quality of their psychometric properties.
Methods:
Following the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Weipu, and Sinomed) were systematically searched for relevant studies published from inception until December 31, 2023. The study protocol received registration with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024546402).
Results:
Eight studies assessing eight identified instruments were included. Four instruments were universal to cancer patients treated with any OAA; the other four instruments were only suitable for a specific type of OAA. None of the studies explored measurement error, cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, and responsiveness of the instruments. All the instruments failed to meet the COSMIN criteria. Eventually, seven instruments were weakly recommended for use to assess OAA adherence, and one was not recommended for assessing OAA adherence due to high-quality evidence for insufficient internal consistency.
Conclusion:
The selection of the most appropriate instrument to assess adherence to OAAs depends on its psychometric properties and relevance to the type of OAA. Eight identified instruments for assessing adherence to OAAs demonstrated limited reliability and validity. Further thorough validation is required for all included instruments. Instruments with rigid measurement properties are urgently needed to be developed to assess OAA adherence in cancer patients.
Insights
Selecting the right tool to track oral antineoplastic agent (OAA) adherence in cancer patients is vital. This review found that current OAA adherence instruments have limited psychometric properties and require further validation for reliable cancer patient monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Health Measurement
Background:
- Oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) are increasingly used for cancer treatment.
- Accurate assessment of patient adherence to OAAs is critical for treatment efficacy.
- Existing instruments for measuring OAA adherence require rigorous evaluation of their psychometric properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments used for assessing adherence to oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) in cancer patients.
- To provide guidance on selecting appropriate measurement tools for OAA adherence.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, Weipu, Sinomed) until December 31, 2023.
- Adherence to Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
- Inclusion of eight studies evaluating eight distinct instruments for OAA adherence.
Main Results:
- Eight instruments were identified, with four applicable to any OAA and four specific to certain OAAs.
- None of the evaluated instruments fully met COSMIN criteria, with significant limitations in measurement error, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness.
- Seven instruments received a weak recommendation for OAA adherence assessment; one was not recommended due to poor internal consistency.
Conclusions:
- Current instruments for assessing OAA adherence in cancer patients exhibit limited reliability and validity.
- Further rigorous validation of existing instruments is essential.
- Development of new instruments with robust measurement properties is urgently needed for accurate OAA adherence assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
