Endoscopic full-thickness resection: A definitive solution for local complete resection of small rectal...

Recently, several endoscopic techniques have been used to improve the R0 resection rate of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NENs). However, none of these methods can achieve 100% complete resection (CR), particularly in the vertical direction. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has proven to be an effective method for the treatment of submucosal tumors but is seldom utilized in the eradication of R-NENs.

To review cases of R-NENs removed using EFTR and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique.

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 160 patients with pathologically confirmed R-NENs, including 132 who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 28 who underwent EFTR. Lesions were categorized as < 1 cm, 1-2 cm, and > 2 cm in size. CR rate, en bloc resection rate, operation time, and complications were evaluated. Subgroup analyses and follow-up were also performed.

EFTR achieved 100% CR rates for lesions < 1 cm and 1-2 cm, compared with 67.0% and 50.0%, respectively, in the ESD group. En bloc resection and successful removal of the R-NENs were achieved in all patients. Meanwhile, EFTR showed performance comparable to ESD in terms of operation time, hospitalization cost, and postoperative adverse events, except for a one-day longer hospital stay. We also analyzed the invasion depth of R-NENs based on full-thickness specimens. The data showed that 80% of lesions (< 1 cm) and 85.7% of lesions (1-2 cm) had invaded the SM3 level or deeper at the time of resection. For ESD specimens, 46.6% (< 1 cm) and 89.3% (1-2 cm) of lesions had infiltrated more than 2000 μm beneath the muscularis mucosae.

EFTR has shown superior performance in the resection of small R-NENs compared with that of ESD.