Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
Published on: January 30, 2020
Guidelines for the Selection of Scintillators for Indirect Photon-Counting X-ray Detectors
J Jasper van Blaaderen1, Casper van Aarle1, David Leibold1
1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
X-ray photon-counting detectors (PCDs) are a rapidly developing technology. Current PCDs used in medical imaging are based on CdTe, CZT, or Si semiconductor detectors, which directly convert X-ray photons into electrical pulses. An alternative approach is to combine ultrafast scintillators with silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). Here, an overview is presented of different classes of scintillators, with the aim of assessing their potential application in scintillator-SiPM based indirect X-ray PCDs. To this end, three figures of merit (FOMs) are defined: the pulse intensity, the pulse duration, and the pulse quality. These FOMs quantify how characteristics such as light yield, pulse shape, and energy resolution affect the suitability of scintillators for application in indirect PCDs. These FOMs are based on emissive characteristics; a fourth FOM (ρZ 3.5) is used to also take stopping power into account. Other important properties for the selection process include low self-absorption, low after-glow, possibility to produce sub-mm pitch pixel arrays, and cost-effectiveness. It is shown that material classes with promising emission properties are Ce3+- or Pr3+-doped materials, near band gap exciton emitters, plastics, and core-valence materials. Possible shortcomings of each of these groups, e.g., suboptimal emission wavelength, nonproportionality, and density, are discussed. Additionally, the engineering approach of quenching the scintillator emission, resulting in a targeted shortening of the decay time, and the possibility of codoping are explored. When selecting and/or engineering a material, it is important to consider not only the characteristics of the scintillator but also relevant SiPM properties, such as recharge time and photodetection efficiency.
More Related Videos
11:27Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2
Published on: December 8, 2016
07:48High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue
Published on: September 30, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Photoluminescence: Applications
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
There are three main types of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) instruments: sequential, simultaneous multichannel, and Fourier transform instruments, with the latter being less commonly used....
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...