Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Evaluation of Intrafractional Anatomical Variations During Liver Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy
Takanori Adachi1, Nobutaka Mukumoto2, Haruo Inokuchi2
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Optical flow analysis revealed significant intrafractional tumor motion during liver magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) under abdominal compression. Tumor motion monitoring in the sagittal plane is recommended due to liver sliding, with margins tailored to tumor location.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Liver magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) requires precise tumor targeting.
- Intrafractional anatomical variations can impact treatment accuracy.
- Abdominal compression (AC) is used to reduce respiratory motion during liver treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify intrafractional anatomical variations during liver MRgART under AC.
- To investigate the utility of optical flow calculations for assessing tumor motion.
- To analyze motion patterns based on tumor location within the liver.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 387,566 slices from 145 cine MRI series in 27 patients undergoing liver MRgART with AC.
- Application of Farnebäck optical flow calculations to determine superior-inferior (SI) motion and root-mean-square error (RMSE).
- Classification of motion parameters (SI, RMSE) in coronal and sagittal planes by tumor location (Couinaud segments).
Main Results:
- Median SI motion ranges were 6.1 mm (coronal) and 8.1 mm (sagittal).
- Segments VI + VII exhibited the largest motion ranges (SIcoronal: 6.5 mm, SIsagittal: 10.6 mm) and RMSE values.
- Dorsally located tumors showed significant sliding motion, contributing to observed differences.
Conclusions:
- Optical flow analysis underestimated SI motion in the coronal plane compared to the sagittal plane.
- Monitoring tumor motion in the sagittal plane is crucial due to liver sliding.
- Individualized treatment margins based on tumor location are recommended for liver MRgART.
More Related Videos
08:17Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
06:53Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
Published on: July 23, 2020