Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioremediation00:46

Bioremediation

18.1K
Bioremediation is the use of prokaryotes, fungi, or plants to remove pollutants from the environment. This process has been used to remove harmful toxins in groundwater as a byproduct of agricultural run-off and also to clean up oil spills.
18.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allergy to Ringer's Lactate - Uncommon Cause of Anaphylaxis during Intraoperative Period: A Case Report.

JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association·2026
Same author

Complications of Central Venous Line Insertion: A Case Series.

JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association·2026
Same author

Scar among Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccinated Children Presenting to an Immunisation Clinic at a Tertiary Hospital in Nepal: An Observational Study.

JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association·2026
Same author

Beyond Invasion: How <i>Phragmites australis</i> Modifies Soil Architecture and Carbon Storage in Long Island Sound Salt Marshes.

Biology·2026
Same author

A first examination of skin-transferred microbiota demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing microbes to determine the age of latent fingerprints: A proof-of-concept study.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Current status and strategies to strengthen paediatric kidney replacement therapy in Nepal.

Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)·2025
Same journal

DNA and RNA metabarcoding reveal shared dominant seed-borne fungi.

Environmental microbiome·2026
Same journal

Balancing deterministic and stochastic assembly during needle aging shapes phyllosphere microbial community complexity and stability.

Environmental microbiome·2026
Same journal

Deep metagenomics uncovers functional adaptations and pathogenic risks in the gut microbiome of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella).

Environmental microbiome·2026
Same journal

Host genotype and edaphic factors shaped bacterial communities associated with native and endemic medicinal Artemisia species in arid environment.

Environmental microbiome·2026
Same journal

Identification of keystone taxa shaping biocrust formation and biodeterioration of limestone monuments in the Xiaoling Tomb of the Ming Dynasty.

Environmental microbiome·2026
Same journal

Season and soil properties structure bacterial communities in hyperacid (pH ≤ 2) fumarolic soils of the Tatun Volcanic Group.

Environmental microbiome·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

15.9K

Microbial composition on microplastics mediated by stream impairment.

Anne L Gilewski1,2, Saurav Shrestha3, Sharon N Kahara3

  • 1Department of Biology and Environmental Science, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA. anne.gilewski@uconn.edu.

Environmental Microbiome
|March 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microplastics in impaired rivers accumulate more fecal coliform bacteria than in clean rivers, potentially worsening water quality. This highlights the need for water remediation and monitoring to mitigate microplastic impacts.

Keywords:
16S rRNA geneBiofilmBiomeColiformFreshwaterImpairmentMicroplasticPollutionRiverineStream

More Related Videos

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.4K
Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
08:30

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 6, 2018

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2025

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

15.9K
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.4K
Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
08:30

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 6, 2018

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Polymer Science

Background:

  • Lotic microplastics can harbor harmful organisms, degrading riverine and marine ecosystems.
  • Suboptimal water quality in riverine systems may influence microplastic-associated microbial communities.
  • Microplastic biofilms are increasingly studied for their role in pollutant transport and ecosystem health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare microbial diversity on microplastic and stone substrates in impaired and unimpaired river sections.
  • To assess the influence of river impairment on biofilm microbial communities.
  • To quantify fecal coliform loads associated with microplastics.

Main Methods:

  • 16S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial diversity analysis.
  • Standard water sampling for total and fecal coliform counts.
  • Comparison of microbial communities on microplastic versus natural stone substrates.

Main Results:

  • Impaired river sites and microplastic substrates showed higher total coliform counts.
  • Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria dominated the microbial communities.
  • The pathogen genus Citrobacter was more abundant on microplastics at both sites.

Conclusions:

  • Impaired waterbodies with microplastics retain higher fecal coliform loads.
  • Microplastics can exacerbate water quality issues in compromised river systems.
  • Water quality remediation and monitoring are crucial to reduce microplastic-associated bacterial accumulation.