Cost-Effectiveness of Aortic Valve Replacement in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Chinese Patients With Severe Aortic

Jin Peng1,2,3,4, Xinglong Zheng5, Minghuan Jiang1,2,3,4,6

  • 1Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy (J.P., M.J., X.Y., Y.M., M.F., Y.F.), Xi'an Jiaotong University, China.

Insights

In China, neither universal Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) nor a risk-based strategy is cost-effective for severe aortic stenosis patients compared to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR). Universal SAVR remains the most cost-effective approach for these patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is debated as an alternative to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR).
  • Severe aortic stenosis management requires evaluating cost-effectiveness, especially in diverse healthcare systems like China's.
  • Risk stratification is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in aortic stenosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TAVR versus SAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in China.
  • To compare universal SAVR, universal TAVR, and a risk-based strategy (SAVR for low-risk, TAVR for intermediate-risk).
  • To determine the most economically viable aortic valve replacement strategy within the Chinese healthcare context.

Main Methods:

  • A decision-analytic model combining decision tree and Markov model was employed.
  • Clinical inputs were derived from meta-analysis; cost data utilized Shaanxi Province claims (2019-2021); quality of life measured by EuroQoL-5D.
  • Sensitivity analyses (one-way and probabilistic Monte Carlo simulations) assessed model robustness.

Main Results:

  • Universal TAVR yielded the most Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) but incurred the highest costs.
  • The risk-based strategy and universal TAVR exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold compared to universal SAVR.
  • Universal SAVR demonstrated an 89.81% probability of being cost-effective, significantly higher than TAVR strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Neither the risk-based strategy nor universal TAVR is cost-effective compared to universal SAVR for low- and intermediate-risk patients in China.
  • Universal SAVR remains the preferred cost-effective strategy for severe aortic stenosis in this population.
  • Significant reductions in TAVR valve costs could potentially alter cost-effectiveness findings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by retrograde blood circulation from the left ventricle into the left atrium due to inadequate mitral valve closure. The severity of the condition, symptoms, and underlying cause determine treatment strategies.Monitoring and Pharmacological TreatmentPatients with mild to moderate MR typically do not need immediate intervention but regular monitoring to assess progression and guide treatment. Patients with mild MR should have an echocardiogram every 3-5...
689
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management01:26

Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

Mitral stenosis, a condition marked by the narrowing of the mitral valve, necessitates an integrated approach for effective management. This approach includes preventative measures, medical therapy, and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and prevent complications.PreventionPrevention of mitral stenosis primarily focuses on reducing the incidence of bacterial infections, particularly streptococcal infections, which can lead to rheumatic fever and subsequent valvular damage. Timely...
538
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction01:15

Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

IntroductionAortic regurgitation is characterized by the backward flow of blood from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole and arises from the improper closure of the aortic valve. This condition results in left ventricular volume overload and can stem from both acute and chronic etiologies, each contributing uniquely to the disease's progression and symptomatology.Acute and Chronic CausesAcute aortic regurgitation often results from events that suddenly impair the integrity of the...
1.6K
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is when the aortic valve does not close or seal properly, leading to backward blood circulation from the aorta into the left ventricle during diastole. Common causes of AR include rheumatic heart disease, congenital valve defects, and aortic root dilation. Managing AR requires a multifaceted approach to alleviate symptoms, preserve left ventricular function, and address the underlying cause of the regurgitation. Patients with symptomatic AR or significant left...
598