Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

19:53
Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
Published on: March 1, 2015
105.8K
Facial Reanimation in Moebius Syndrome Using Bilateral Free Gracilis Transfer: 1-Stage versus 2-Stage Procedures
Kenzo Alejandro Fukumoto-Inukai1, Damián Palafox1, Enrique Chávez-Serna1
1From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|March 18, 2025
Summary
The one-stage bilateral free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) for Complete Moebius Syndrome (CMS) offers comparable outcomes to the traditional two-stage approach. This new method is more cost-effective, with shorter procedures and hospital stays.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Complete Moebius Syndrome (CMS) is a rare congenital disorder affecting cranial nerves VII and VI.
- It results in bilateral facial paralysis and limited eye movement (ocular abduction).
- Bilateral free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) is the established surgical treatment, traditionally performed in two stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the surgical outcomes and long-term results of a novel one-stage bilateral FGMT with the traditional two-stage approach for CMS.
- To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the one-stage versus two-stage FGMT in CMS patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study included 18 CMS patients who underwent either one-stage or two-stage bilateral FGMT.
- Data collected included sociodemographic factors, perioperative/postoperative parameters, costs, patient satisfaction, and long-term aesthetic and functional outcomes.
- Follow-up averaged 8.1 years, with statistical analysis using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.05 significance).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in postoperative complications like flap loss, hematoma, or infections were found between the one-stage and two-stage groups.
- The one-stage procedure resulted in significantly shorter surgeries (p=0.050), reduced hospital stays (p=0.001), and lower overall costs (p=0.001).
- Long-term aesthetic and functional outcomes were comparable between both surgical approaches (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- One-stage bilateral FGMT is a safe and effective alternative to the two-stage procedure for CMS.
- The one-stage approach offers significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness, surgical duration, and hospital stay.
- Both methods yield similar satisfactory long-term aesthetic and functional results for patients with Complete Moebius Syndrome.

