Comparison of the clock, stochastic cutoff, and Tomita Monte Carlo methods in simulating the dipolar triangular
1Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, Department of Physics, (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran.
Abstract:
Magnetic nanostructures find application in diverse technological domains, and their behavior is significantly influenced by long-range dipolar interactions. However, simulating these systems using the traditional Metropolis Monte Carlo method poses high computational demand. Several methods, including the clock, stochastic cutoff, and Tomita approaches, can reduce the computational burden of simulating 2D systems with dipolar interactions. Although these three methods rely on distinct theoretical concepts, they all achieve complexity reduction by a common strategy. Instead of calculating the energy difference between a spin and all its neighbors, they evaluate the energy difference with only a limited number of randomly chosen neighbors. This is achieved through methods like the dynamic thinning and Fukui-Todo techniques. In this article, we compared the performance of the clock, SCO, Tomita, and Metropolis methods near the critical point of the dipolar triangular lattice to identify the most suitable algorithm for this type of simulation. Our findings show that while these methods are less suitable for simulating this system in their untuned implementation, incorporating the boxing near-neighbors method and overrelaxation moves makes them significantly more efficient and better suited than the Metropolis method with overrelaxation.
More Related Videos
08:55Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
10:52Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2âÃÂÃÂy2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2âÃÂÃÂy2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes)...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
