Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Published on: December 8, 2014
Antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancy: a comparison of practice and guidelines in
Özlem Güzel Tunçcan1, Seçkin Çağirgan2, Hakan Özdoğu3
1Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Background/Aim:
Primary antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is as considered the gold standard therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies based on the available guidelines. The aim behind this study was to investigate the level of guideline knowledge and the translation of guideline recommendations into real-life settings among physicians in Türkiye.
Materials And Methods:
In this prospective, observational study, the physicians' knowledge of AFP guideline recommendations for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing first remission-induction (Group I) or graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplant (Group II) was compared with clinical practice via an 11-item multiple-choice questionnaire evaluating the patients in whom AFP was initiated, the timing, the AFP duration, and the drugs used.
Results:
The mean patient age was 48.3 years and 79% had AML/MDS. AFP was initiated in 75.3% of Group I patients on the first day of induction chemotherapy before baseline and in 26.2% of Group II patients at baseline. For 98.8% of the Group I patients, the physician's plan was to continue AFP until recovery from neutropenia and complete remission (CR), whereas it was to be used during immunosuppression in Group II. The median (IQR) duration of AFP was 0.8 (0.5-1.9) and 5.5 (2.4-8.1) months for Groups I and II, respectively. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) were observed in 35.8% and 14.3% of Groups I and II, respectively.The mean survey scores were 8.5 ± 2.3 for the AML/MDS patient group and 9.9 ± 3.2 for the GvHD patient group. Most of the surveyed sites adhered to the guidelines from the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (80.6%), followed by the fever and neutropenia guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (51.6%). Posaconazole was the drug of choice in both groups (96.8% in Group I vs. 71% in Groups II).
Conclusion:
The data indicate an inconsistency between real-life clinical practice and the guideline recommendations for primary AFP and bIFI management in high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies in Türkiye.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
