Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

14:08
Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
42.5K
Development and Validation of a Sham-AI Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection at CT Angiography
Zhao Shi1, Bin Hu1, Mengjie Lu2
1Department of Radiology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China.
Radiology. Artificial Intelligence
|March 19, 2025
Summary
A sham artificial intelligence (AI) model did not negatively impact radiologists' diagnostic performance for intracranial aneurysms. This sham AI served as a placebo control, confirming the benefits of standard AI in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Neuroradiology
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used for medical diagnoses.
- Evaluating the true impact of AI requires rigorous control measures, such as placebo comparisons.
- Intracranial aneurysms are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating accurate diagnostic tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and assess a sham artificial intelligence (AI) model as a placebo control.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without AI assistance.
- To evaluate the impact of a sham AI on radiologists' diagnostic accuracy for intracranial aneurysms.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, blinded, multireader, multicase study involving 16,422 CT angiography examinations.
- Development of a sham AI with near-zero sensitivity and standard AI with high sensitivity and specificity.
- Twenty-eight radiologists were assigned to read cases with standard AI, sham AI, or no AI assistance in a crossover design.
Main Results:
- Standard AI demonstrated high sensitivity (96.0%) and specificity (82.0%), while sham AI performed poorly (0.0% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity).
- Radiologists assisted by standard AI showed significantly improved sensitivity (20.7% increase) compared to sham AI-assisted readings.
- Sham AI assistance did not compromise radiologists' diagnostic performance, with sensitivity and specificity comparable to unassisted readings.
Conclusions:
- The developed sham AI model effectively served as a placebo control in evaluating AI-assisted diagnosis.
- Radiologists' diagnostic performance was not negatively affected by the sham AI, indicating its inertness as a control.
- This study validates the methodology for assessing AI tools in medical diagnostics, confirming the benefits of standard AI for intracranial aneurysm detection.

