Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

A Rat Model of Mild Intrauterine Hypoperfusion with Microcoil Stenosis
Published on: January 7, 2018
Fertility of Adults Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight
Miranda Kit-Yi Wong1, Nicole Tsalacopoulos1,2,3,4, Peter Bartmann5
1Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Insights
Adults born very preterm (VP) or with very low birth weight (VLBW) have lower fertility, primarily due to reduced partnering. Partnering is key to reproductive success for these individuals.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Health
- Perinatal Medicine
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Contradictory findings exist regarding fertility in adults born very preterm (VP) or with very low birth weight (VLBW).
- Longitudinal data on fertility in these populations beyond age 29 years are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between VP/VLBW and fertility up to age 35.
- To compare fertility outcomes between VP/VLBW individuals and term-born controls.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, population-based cohort study in Bavaria, Germany.
- Included VP/VLBW individuals and term-born controls, followed up to 34-35 years.
- Fertility assessed via cumulative incidence of first live birth, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
Main Results:
- VP/VLBW individuals showed lower cumulative fertility.
- The association between VP/VLBW and lower fertility was significant in the late reproductive window (≥30 years).
- Partnering emerged as a significant factor influencing fertility in both early and late reproductive windows.
Conclusions:
- VP and VLBW are associated with reduced overall fertility in adults up to age 35.
- Reduced partnering significantly contributes to lower fertility in VP/VLBW individuals.
- Promoting partnering may be crucial for improving reproductive success in this population.
Importance:
Contradictory differences regarding fertility among adults born very preterm (VP; <32 weeks' gestation) or with very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) have been reported at different ages. Longitudinal investigations of fertility beyond ages 20 to 29 years are lacking.
Objective:
To assess whether VP and VLBW are associated with lower fertility up to age 35 years.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This prospective population-based cohort study was conducted in Bavaria, Germany, with participants born between January 1985 and March 1986 who required admission to a children's hospital within the first 10 days after birth. Healthy infants born at term (ie, at least 37 weeks' gestation) in the same hospital and children alive at 6 years were selected as controls. Follow-up occurred repeatedly up to 34 to 35 years. Data were analyzed from July to December 2024.
Exposures:
Gestational age and birth weight.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Cumulative incidence of having the first alive child (ie, fertility) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation and the difference between participants born VP or with VLBW and term-born participants was compared with log-rank tests. Univariable and hierarchical multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for fertility associated with VP and VLBW adjusting for individual factors. Estimations were compared between early (<30 years) and late (≥30 years) reproductive windows.
Results:
A total of 414 participants (212 born VP or with VLBW and 202 term-born) were included (mean [SD] age, 34.67 [0.53] years; 216 [52.2%] female). Cumulative incidence of having the first alive child was lower in participants born VP or with VLBW throughout the follow-up. The association of VP and VLBW with lower fertility was significant during the late (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.68) but not early (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.47-1.14) reproductive window; this association attenuated after adjusting for neonatal factors (sex and family socioeconomic status) and childhood neurosensory impairment at step 2 (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.88), childhood family factors (eg, parenting) at step 3 (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92), and there was no longer an association after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (eg, partnering) at step 4 (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.50-1.20). Partnering (ie, being married or cohabitating with a partner) had the largest magnitude association with fertility across both the early (HR, 7.87; 95% CI, 3.44-18.00) and late (HR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.47-6.31) reproductive windows.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study of participants born VP or with VLBW and term-born adults, VP and VLBW were associated with overall lower fertility. A major reason was an association of less partnering with lower fertility, suggesting that partnering is key to reproductive success.
More Related Videos
06:11Author Spotlight: Exploring the Long-Term Health Impacts of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection on Offspring
Published on: May 17, 2024
05:42Author Spotlight: Advancing Fertility Assessment with Z-Score-Based Follicle Density Evaluation in Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Infertility in Males
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Spermatogenesis
Teratogenicity
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Oogenesis